Leveraging mega-threats to reduce prejudice: a model for multi-level changes

Abstract

PurposeThe paper introduces a multi-level model to reduce prejudice through supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) at the institutional, organizational, and individual levels. The purpose of the model is to provide theoretically undergirded pathways to explain how societal events calling for systemic changes in DEI practices can engage and inculcate such systemic changes in organizations and institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe model draws upon macro-level (i.e. institutional theory and institutional logics) theories from sociology and strategic management, meso-level theories from leadership and strategy, and micro-level organizational behavior and human resource management theories.FindingsResting on open systems theory (Katz and Kahn, 1966) as a backdrop, the authors address how institutional changes result in organizational level changes driving multi-level outcomes of increased DEI, reduced prejudice in work-related settings, and performance gains. The authors suggest the recursive nature of the model can trigger institutional level shifts in logics or result in isomorphic pressures that further change organizational fields and organizations.Originality/valueThe contribution rests in a multi-level examination to help understand how environmental pressures can motivate organizations to enact broader changes related to social justice, specifically increasing efforts in DEI inside the operational aspects of the organization. By enacting these changes, the authors suggest the resultant positive changes in organizations will enhance culture and performance, creating isomorphic pressure for industry wide changes that may begin to move the needle on addressing systemic problems that feed prejudicial behavior in the workplace.

An interdisciplinary approach to examining prejudice at work: a levels of analysis perspective

“…An examination of recommended research strategies in various contexts suggests the usefulness of multidisciplinary perspectives (Casali and Perano, 2021; Jankelova and Puhovichova, 2022; Johnson and Schminke, 2020; Kiss et al. , 2020; Waples and Morgan, 2022; Zhou et al. , 2019).…”

“…Increasingly, research on prejudice has been intersectional, meaning several bases for discrimination are considered in the same research context (Di Stasio and Larsen, 2020;Frederick and Shifrer, 2019;Marcus and Fritzsche, 2015;Tresh et al, 2019). An examination of recommended research strategies in various contexts suggests the usefulness of multidisciplinary perspectives (Casali and Perano, 2021;Jankelova and Puhovichova, 2022;Johnson and Schminke, 2020;Kiss et al, 2020;Waples and Morgan, 2022;Zhou et al, 2019).…”