2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging impurities in recycled lead anodes for sodium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1−4 Therefore, SIBs gradually serve as an important supplement to LIBs while replacing lead-acid batteries. 5,6 However, commonly used anode materials lose their advantage in SIBs due to the larger radius of Na + (0.102 nm) than Li + (0.076 nm); 7,8 especially, commercial graphite fails to insert Na + in carbonate ester-based electrolytes. 2,9,10 As a substitute of graphite, hard carbons suit Na + storage due to their distorted graphene layers, large interlayer spacing, and open/closed pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1−4 Therefore, SIBs gradually serve as an important supplement to LIBs while replacing lead-acid batteries. 5,6 However, commonly used anode materials lose their advantage in SIBs due to the larger radius of Na + (0.102 nm) than Li + (0.076 nm); 7,8 especially, commercial graphite fails to insert Na + in carbonate ester-based electrolytes. 2,9,10 As a substitute of graphite, hard carbons suit Na + storage due to their distorted graphene layers, large interlayer spacing, and open/closed pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the similar energy storage mechanisms with lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) can not only meet the requirements of low cost, long cycle-life, and high stability/safety in the market of electrochemical energy storage, but also alleviate the limited development of LIBs to some extent, which is caused by the shortage of lithium resources. Therefore, SIBs gradually serve as an important supplement to LIBs while replacing lead-acid batteries. , However, commonly used anode materials lose their advantage in SIBs due to the larger radius of Na + (0.102 nm) than Li + (0.076 nm); , especially, commercial graphite fails to insert Na + in carbonate ester-based electrolytes. ,, As a substitute of graphite, hard carbons suit Na + storage due to their distorted graphene layers, large interlayer spacing, and open/closed pores. , Yet, hard carbons usually deliver an inferior reversible capacity (∼300 mAh g –1 ) with poor high-rate capability (≤2 A g –1 ), because of the low diffusion coefficient of Na + (8.88 × 10 –7 cm 2 s –1 ) in carbonate ester-based electrolytes. ,,, Porous carbons have merits of high specific surface area (SSA), expanded interlayer distance, hierarchical pores, heteroatoms doping, and plentiful defects, which pave the way for obtaining high-rate-capability SIBs through increases in the physisorption/chemisorption for high capacitive capacity (fast Na + storage kinetics). Nevertheless, porous carbons suffer from the conventional preparation strategies: physical/chemical activation creates rich pores but with irregular structure; artificial templates can obtain regular structure but with difficult post-purification. , As a result, there is an urgent need to develop novel synthetic methods of carbon-based anodes with delicate structural regulation and demonstrate their feasibility for high-performance practical SIBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%