2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging cultural differences to promote educational equality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Racial gaps in funding are due in part to NIH offering less funding for topics that are relatively more popular among Black scientists (e.g., interventions, disparities) and more funding for topics that are relatively more popular among White scientists (e.g., fundamentals, mechanisms; Hoppe et al, 2019; see also Hofstra et al, 2020). Understanding why Native American students tend to underperform in school compared with White students benefits from a cultural approach that considers how schools default to culturally independent ways of being, such as working alone and carving one’s own path, instead of culturally interdependent ways of being, such as working with others and adjusting to others’ expectations (Brady, Germano, & Fryberg, 2017; Fryberg & Markus, 2007). Similarly, understanding why Asian students are perceived as “too quiet” or “disengaged” in the American classroom benefits from a cultural analysis that reveals how American classroom practices value and reward culturally independent practices such as self-expression and distinguishing oneself from others (H.…”
Section: Part 4: Empirical Evidence For Masculine Defaultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Racial gaps in funding are due in part to NIH offering less funding for topics that are relatively more popular among Black scientists (e.g., interventions, disparities) and more funding for topics that are relatively more popular among White scientists (e.g., fundamentals, mechanisms; Hoppe et al, 2019; see also Hofstra et al, 2020). Understanding why Native American students tend to underperform in school compared with White students benefits from a cultural approach that considers how schools default to culturally independent ways of being, such as working alone and carving one’s own path, instead of culturally interdependent ways of being, such as working with others and adjusting to others’ expectations (Brady, Germano, & Fryberg, 2017; Fryberg & Markus, 2007). Similarly, understanding why Asian students are perceived as “too quiet” or “disengaged” in the American classroom benefits from a cultural analysis that reveals how American classroom practices value and reward culturally independent practices such as self-expression and distinguishing oneself from others (H.…”
Section: Part 4: Empirical Evidence For Masculine Defaultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not much has changed. U.S. schools still segregate by race and class, privilege one cultural way (i.e., White middle-class values), present marginalized groups as deficient, and reinforce stereotypes that undermine academic performance (Brady et al, 2017; Frankenberg et al, 2019; Sleeter & Zavala, 2020). Today, Black, Latinx, and Native American students demonstrate less reading achievement, math achievement, and advanced placement than their White peers (NCES, 2019).…”
Section: Ongoing Omission and Marginalization In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has built on these findings, searching for ways to alleviate non-WEIRD students' anxiety and underperformance in educational contexts (78)(79)(80)(81), arguing for culturally grounded (vs. one-size-fits-all) educational interventions (82), and creating interdependent school cultures to improve non-WEIRD students' outcomes (83). This work provides a starting point for understanding how cultural factors such as race and social class interact with contextual factors to shape students' outcomes.…”
Section: Characteristic #3: Misapplication Of Weird Findings In Non-wmentioning
confidence: 99%