Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to cell phone data, all of the typical limitations of geo-tracking apply, with certain groups such as older residents less likely to be represented (Coston et al, 2021). Overall, although only 10% of urban residents are represented in SafeGraph data, the company's sampling is highly correlated with true census populations (Kang et al, 2020;SafeGraph, 2021b).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to cell phone data, all of the typical limitations of geo-tracking apply, with certain groups such as older residents less likely to be represented (Coston et al, 2021). Overall, although only 10% of urban residents are represented in SafeGraph data, the company's sampling is highly correlated with true census populations (Kang et al, 2020;SafeGraph, 2021b).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an analysis done by Safegraph, the panel is representative of race, educational attainment, and income ( Fox, 2019 ). On the other hand, a recent independent analysis shows that older and non-white individuals are less likely to be captured in the panel for POI-specific analyses ( Coston et al, 2021 ). It is important to note that both studies are associative in nature as the devices in the panel are fully anonymized, so no device-level demographic data exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that both studies are associative in nature as the devices in the panel are fully anonymized, so no device-level demographic data exists. Continued work to understand the sampling biases of such datasets will be needed so that improved bias correction approaches can be developed ( Coston et al, 2021 ). Additionally, we limit our scope in this study to consider only the number of visits and do not incorporate information about visit duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of MPS data is that some minor groups (e.g. children or the elderly) are likely to be underrepresented ( Coston et al, 2021 ), and only 5% of Shenzhen residents are employed for measure the park visits in our study. The combination of multiple sources of MPS big data and surveyed data of specific subpopulations might be a solution to these representative issues in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%