2023
DOI: 10.52562/jdle.v3i2.708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Academic Social Media to Improve Librarian Research Output in Scopus/Web of Science Indexed Outlets

Adebowale Adetayo,
Mufutau Asiru,
Olateju Abayomi Adeleke
et al.

Abstract: The present study aimed to investigate the impact of academic social media utilization on the volume of research output by librarians working in the southwestern region of Nigeria. This investigation adopted a descriptive survey research design and a sample of 363 librarians employed in university libraries located in the southwestern region of Nigeria. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were utilized to analyze the data collected. The results of the study revealed a low level of research output b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These barriers often result in scholars facing challenges in disseminating their research findings to a wider audience (Ikolo & Adomi, 2022). However, Adetayo et al (2023) note that scholars are under pressure to produce a high volume of publications, which may prioritize quantity over the quality of research outputs. This pressure can lead to the proliferation of low-impact research and undermine the integrity of scholarly publishing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers often result in scholars facing challenges in disseminating their research findings to a wider audience (Ikolo & Adomi, 2022). However, Adetayo et al (2023) note that scholars are under pressure to produce a high volume of publications, which may prioritize quantity over the quality of research outputs. This pressure can lead to the proliferation of low-impact research and undermine the integrity of scholarly publishing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%