2021
DOI: 10.1108/imds-10-2020-0587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leverage risks for supply chain robustness against corruption

Abstract: PurposeThis paper examines the establishment of supply chain robustness against corruption by utilizing risk interactions.Design/methodology/approachBased on empirical results from the New Zealand dairy industry, a system dynamics model is established to explore the underlying relationships among variables.FindingsThe results show that although certain supply chain risks seem unrelated to corruption, their mitigation would help mitigate the impact of corruption due to risk interactions; and mitigation of some … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use P ij to describe the performance when adjusting the variable to the degree of i under the interruption scenario of j, where i represents different adjustment degrees of decision variables and j represents different interruption scenarios. In line with previous research by Liu et al (2019) and Liu et al (2021), this paper uses the relative change P rci instead of absolute change to measure the performance differences, where P rci ¼ ðP i;j 0 − P ij Þ=P ij ; ði ¼ 0; 1; 2; 3; 4; j ¼ 0; 1; 2; 3; 4Þ, P i;j 0 represents the adjusted performance. The lease value of P rci represents the situation where the epidemic has the most negligible impact on SCP, signifying that SC robustness against epidemic achieves the maximum value.…”
Section: Robustness Analysis Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We use P ij to describe the performance when adjusting the variable to the degree of i under the interruption scenario of j, where i represents different adjustment degrees of decision variables and j represents different interruption scenarios. In line with previous research by Liu et al (2019) and Liu et al (2021), this paper uses the relative change P rci instead of absolute change to measure the performance differences, where P rci ¼ ðP i;j 0 − P ij Þ=P ij ; ði ¼ 0; 1; 2; 3; 4; j ¼ 0; 1; 2; 3; 4Þ, P i;j 0 represents the adjusted performance. The lease value of P rci represents the situation where the epidemic has the most negligible impact on SCP, signifying that SC robustness against epidemic achieves the maximum value.…”
Section: Robustness Analysis Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In line with previous research by Liu et al. (2019) and Liu et al. (2021), this paper uses the relative change Prci instead of absolute change to measure the performance differences, where Prci=|(Pi,jPij)/Pij|,(i=0,1,2,3,4; j=0,1,2,3,4), Pi,j represents the adjusted performance.…”
Section: Model Simulation and Robustness Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations