Thinking in Systems 2012
DOI: 10.4324/9781849773386-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leverage Points—Places to Intervene in a System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this article supports the conception of a digital intervention and information system in Québec. Although technical and communicational at first glance, the literature review showed that engagement is socially anchored ( Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2022 ; Meadows, 2009a ; Milestad et al, 2012 ). Thus, program’s logic model on AMU monitoring needs both data originators and users’ proactive participation, and also several societal facilitators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this article supports the conception of a digital intervention and information system in Québec. Although technical and communicational at first glance, the literature review showed that engagement is socially anchored ( Boudreau LeBlanc et al, 2022 ; Meadows, 2009a ; Milestad et al, 2012 ). Thus, program’s logic model on AMU monitoring needs both data originators and users’ proactive participation, and also several societal facilitators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-linearity is the idea that a complex problem cannot be described in a sequential, linear fashion, and thus an intervention in one part of the system may not necessarily result in an equal change to another part of the system (Meadows, 2008;Willy et al, 2003;Wright & Meadows, 2009). Understanding the distinction between interventions into a system that is perceived as linear versus into a system that is perceived as complex (Fischer & Riechers, 2019) can provide new methods for evaluation and contribute additional insights into how planning problems may (or may not) unfold.…”
Section: Non-linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps one of the strongest benefits of systems mapping and systems thinking overall, is its potential to uncover leverage points that can be used as building blocks to introduce targeted interventions into the system to generate effective solutions. Beyond identifying errors or negative interactions in the system, levers highlight potential points of intervention (Abson et al, 2017)-specific interventions that are contingent on the context of the system and its intended outcome (Fischer & Riechers, 2019;Wright & Meadows, 2009). Fischer and Riechers (2019) argue, 'a leverage point's perspective explicitly recognises influential, "deep" leverage points-places at which interventions are difficult but likely to yield truly transformative change' and further 'can function as a methodological boundary object-that is, providing a common entry point for academics from different disciplines and other societal stakeholders to work together ' (p. 115).…”
Section: Systems Mapping: Operationalizing Feedback Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%