1968
DOI: 10.2307/2325510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leverage, Diversification and Capital Market Effects on a Risk-Adjusted Capital Budgeting Framework

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Wiley and American Finance Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, under idealized uncertainty, our optimum production conditions and risk‐adjusted discount rates reduce to the investment criterion proposed by Hamada [4], Mossin [9], and Tuttle and Litzenberger [13]. (6) and (17) are Tuttle and Litzenberger's criterion which, as Litzenberger and Budd [7] have shown, is equivalent to the criteria of Hamada and Mossin 5 .…”
Section: Optimal Structure Under Sharpe‐lintner Idealized Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, under idealized uncertainty, our optimum production conditions and risk‐adjusted discount rates reduce to the investment criterion proposed by Hamada [4], Mossin [9], and Tuttle and Litzenberger [13]. (6) and (17) are Tuttle and Litzenberger's criterion which, as Litzenberger and Budd [7] have shown, is equivalent to the criteria of Hamada and Mossin 5 .…”
Section: Optimal Structure Under Sharpe‐lintner Idealized Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The effect of investment decisions on business risk has been studied by several authors (Hamada [4], Mossin [9], and Tuttle and Litzenberger [13]) under the conditions of idealized uncertainty assumed in the Sharpe‐Lintner capital market theory. The investment criterion derived in this paper is shown to be generalization of theirs, and of the one obtained by Modigliani and Miller [8] under the constant risk class assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and 5), in that they result from valuation models developed in a portfolio framework. Similar attempts to develop capital budgeting rules from the Sharpe‐Lintner portfolio models have been made by Tuttle and Litzenberger [18] and Litzenberger [8]. Another recent contribution which includes corporate leverage in a portfolio valuation model is that of Hamada [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It can easily be shown that this acceptance criteria may be reduced to the specification of the required rate of return or hurdle rate on investment, rz, discussed by Tuttle and Litzenberger [20] and Litzenberger and Budd [9], normalrtrue¯normalz=normalμnormalznormalIr+θρzMnormalsnormalz …”
Section: Effect Of Changes In Money Supply On Required Rates Of Returmentioning
confidence: 99%