gwp 2010
DOI: 10.24149/gwp45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leverage Constraints and the International Transmission of Shocks

Abstract: Recent macroeconomic experience has drawn attention to the importance of interdependence among countries through financial markets and institutions, independently of traditional trade linkages. This paper develops a model of the international transmission of shocks due to interdependent portfolio holdings among leverage-constrained investors. In our model, without leverage constraints on investment, financial integration itself has no implication for international macro co-movements. When leverage constraints … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
82
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
82
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models may also yield a positive (rather than a negative) relation between banking integration and business cycle synchronization (stemming from the feedback from interest rates to capital values). The early literature models this by introducing financial frictions into the standard international real business cycle model (with productivity/technology shocks), which stop or reverse the direction of capital flows (Calvo and Mendoza (2000)), or by introducing leveraged and constrained firms that liquidate and run asset prices down when they are hit by a negative shock to their capital (Devereux and Yetman (2010)). 9 The recent literature introduces banking shocks in addition to productivity shocks (e.g., Perri and Quadrini (2011), Mendoza and Quadrini (2010), Enders, Kollmann, and Müller (2010), Kalemli-Ozcan, Papaioannou, and Perri (2013)).…”
Section: B Theory: Financial Integration and Higher Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models may also yield a positive (rather than a negative) relation between banking integration and business cycle synchronization (stemming from the feedback from interest rates to capital values). The early literature models this by introducing financial frictions into the standard international real business cycle model (with productivity/technology shocks), which stop or reverse the direction of capital flows (Calvo and Mendoza (2000)), or by introducing leveraged and constrained firms that liquidate and run asset prices down when they are hit by a negative shock to their capital (Devereux and Yetman (2010)). 9 The recent literature introduces banking shocks in addition to productivity shocks (e.g., Perri and Quadrini (2011), Mendoza and Quadrini (2010), Enders, Kollmann, and Müller (2010), Kalemli-Ozcan, Papaioannou, and Perri (2013)).…”
Section: B Theory: Financial Integration and Higher Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 2008 crisis, using data for 45 large banks in Europe and the United States, Eichengreen et al (2009) find that sensitivity to common shocks increased fall of 2008 volatility peaks for bank credit default swap spreads. Devereux and Yetman (2009) link cross-border lending and leverage to recessions.…”
Section: Concepts: Common Shocks Versus International Transmission Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in our model price crashes are larger with financial integration, not in autarky. Theoretical work by Devereux and Yetman (2010) and Ueda (2012) present models, with financial intermediaries or with leverage constraints, in which financial integration affects spillovers, propagation through interdependent portfolios, and business-cycle synchronization.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%