1987
DOI: 10.1080/07494468708567059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of structure in the organization of musical time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
6

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
2
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…According to him, listening to music only requires one to be focused on the present with the exclusion of any attempt at recollection or anticipation. From a psychological point of view, listeners would thus perceive incoming events through a short temporal window that slides along the event stream (Bigand, 1993;Clarke, 1987;Fraisse, 1957;Michon, 1977). The size of a temporal window (referred to as the "perceptual present" in Fraisse and as "quasi hearing" in Levinson) is constrained by several factors, but its maximal duration is considered to vary between 5 s (Fraisse) and 8 s (Michon) to 10 s (Clarke) or even 30 s (Levinson).…”
Section: Cognitive Psychological Approaches the Perceptual Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to him, listening to music only requires one to be focused on the present with the exclusion of any attempt at recollection or anticipation. From a psychological point of view, listeners would thus perceive incoming events through a short temporal window that slides along the event stream (Bigand, 1993;Clarke, 1987;Fraisse, 1957;Michon, 1977). The size of a temporal window (referred to as the "perceptual present" in Fraisse and as "quasi hearing" in Levinson) is constrained by several factors, but its maximal duration is considered to vary between 5 s (Fraisse) and 8 s (Michon) to 10 s (Clarke) or even 30 s (Levinson).…”
Section: Cognitive Psychological Approaches the Perceptual Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il s'agit là de règles d'interprétation communes aux interprètes, qui soulignent les micro-structures spécifiques et reproductibles du contenu musical [Juslin 2000]. Grâce à ces principes génératifs de l'expressivité, une représentation mentale de la structure musicale peut être encodée au travers des gestes de l'instrumentiste et facilement décodée par l'auditeur [Clarke 1987, Clarke 1988, Clarke 1989]. On touche ici du doigt la notion de cognition musicale incarnée (musical embodied cognition) que nous expliciterons davantage à la section 2.5.2.…”
Section: Les Variations Dues à La Structure Musicaleunclassified
“…In that sense, the musical score is a better representation of rhythmic patterns as it represents exactly those perceived categories instead of the absolute and accurate timing of notes. While the IOIs are perceived as belonging to discrete categories, such as the note durations of a musical score, continuous time changes and deviations from the canonical version of those categories are usually understood at a different structural level as tempo changes and expressive timing (Clarke, 1987b). Rhythmic patterns with slight variations in the actual IOIs are considered as being the same pattern of durations performed, perhaps, with a different "feel" such as "laid-back" (Desain & Honing, 2003).…”
Section: From Sound To Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The listener essentially interprets a rhythm by constructing a metrical context. Meter is, therefore, subjective and may differ between listeners (Clarke, 1987a(Clarke, , 1987bFraisse, 1982;Parncutt, 1994).…”
Section: Rhythm Meter Syncopationmentioning
confidence: 99%