2006
DOI: 10.1309/w5mqy4bvafeg8f8w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of Serum Zinc in Children With Enterocolitis and Chronic Malabsorption Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in group II and in subgroups A, B and C; no significant correlations exist between the number of deliveries and serum Zn concentration. Serum Zn is the most widely used index of Zn status in human (WHO, 2001;Angelova et al, 2006;WHO et al, 2007).In this study serum Zn concentration among apparently healthy non-married women showed a normal distribution pattern (Fig. 2) with the reference range (X ± 2SD) of 9.78-14.41 µmol/L which lower than the international reference range of 11.6-23.0 µmol/L obtained by atomic absorption spectrometry method (Akl, 2001).This is probably due to the relatively small sample size used in this study, in addition although the atomic absorption spectrometry method offer greater sensitivity with good analytical parameters and accuracy (Angelova et al, 2006), but it is tedious and subject to numerous interferences (WHO, 2001) and variation in the laboratory estimations (Pathak et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in group II and in subgroups A, B and C; no significant correlations exist between the number of deliveries and serum Zn concentration. Serum Zn is the most widely used index of Zn status in human (WHO, 2001;Angelova et al, 2006;WHO et al, 2007).In this study serum Zn concentration among apparently healthy non-married women showed a normal distribution pattern (Fig. 2) with the reference range (X ± 2SD) of 9.78-14.41 µmol/L which lower than the international reference range of 11.6-23.0 µmol/L obtained by atomic absorption spectrometry method (Akl, 2001).This is probably due to the relatively small sample size used in this study, in addition although the atomic absorption spectrometry method offer greater sensitivity with good analytical parameters and accuracy (Angelova et al, 2006), but it is tedious and subject to numerous interferences (WHO, 2001) and variation in the laboratory estimations (Pathak et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid phase extraction (SPE) has been widely used for preconcentration of heavy metals due to many advantages, while conventional SPE methods have some limitations with respect to disadvantages of employing large volumes of hazardous organic solvents, producing secondary waste, and tedious procedures. [17][18][19][20][21] A new approach is developed for sample preparation, solid-phase microextraction (SPmE). It was invented by Pawliszyn and co-workers 22,23 in 1989, to reduce the limitations inherent in SPE and LLE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This draw back can be overcome by the combination of a suitable preconcentration-separation technique with subsequent AAS determination. Solid phase extraction (SPE) has been widely used for preconcentration of heavy metals due to advantages such as, high efficiency, simplicity, rapidity, low consumption of material especially toxic organic solvents [1][2][3][4][5], freedom from contamination and the possibility of combination with AAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%