Levels of Evidence in Plastic Surgery

Denadai, Rafael; Raposo-Amaral, Cássio Eduardo

doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000000816

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Para intentar aclarar lo anterior, revisamos dirigidamente todos los artículos de Chile enfocados en este aspecto y analizamos sus autores según la fecha de publicación del artículo y los respectivos años de residencia de los mismos, con lo que logramos aumentar esta cifra de un 8.4% a un 34.4%. (16)(17)(18) Este valor posiblemente se acerque más al porcentaje real de participación de residentes, especialmente considerando que el 58.2% de los estudios tenían asociación a Centros Universitarios.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Tendencias y perfil de publicación de los cirujanos plásticos de los 22 países miembros de la FILACP, revisión de los últimos 20 años

Navia

Lopez

González

et al. 2019

Cir. plást. iberolatinoam.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Tendencias y perfil de publicación de los cirujanos plásticos de los 22 países miembros de la FILACP, revisión de los últimos 20 años

Navia

Lopez

González

et al. 2019

Cir. plást. iberolatinoam.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Discrepancies Between Plastic Surgery Meeting Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Length Manuscript Publications

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Public Perceptions of Plastic Surgery Practice in Brazil

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The perception of medical specialists by the public has a significant effect on health-care decisions, research funding allocation, and implantation of educational measures. The purpose of this survey was to assess the public's perception of the field of plastic surgery practice. General public members (n=1290) completed a survey where they matched nine specialties with 28 plastic surgery-related scenarios. Response patterns were distributed as "plastic surgeon alone," "plastic surgeon combined with other specialists," or "no plastic surgeon." Sociodemographic data and previous plastic surgery contact were also collected. "Plastic surgeon alone" was identified as an expert by more than 70 % of respondents in four (40 %) aesthetic-related scenarios and in one (5.5 %) general/reconstructive-related scenario. "Plastic surgeon alone" was significantly (all p<0.05) more recognized as an expert than other response patterns in all aesthetic-related scenarios, except for botulinum toxin for facial wrinkles. There was a significant (all p<0.05) poor understanding of the role of plastic surgeons in facial fracture surgery, facial paralysis management, chest wall surgery, hand surgery-related scenarios, and tumor surgery-related scenarios. Age, health-care professional, education level, and prior plastic surgery contact were significant (all p<0.05) determinants of "plastic surgeon" as a response pattern, according to bivariate analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The public has a poor understanding of the broad field of plastic surgery practice.Therefore, improved public education about the scope of plastic surgery is needed.

show abstract

Levels of Evidence in Plastic Surgery

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

Tendencias y perfil de publicación de los cirujanos plásticos de los 22 países miembros de la FILACP, revisión de los últimos 20 años

Tendencias y perfil de publicación de los cirujanos plásticos de los 22 países miembros de la FILACP, revisión de los últimos 20 años

Discrepancies Between Plastic Surgery Meeting Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Length Manuscript Publications

Public Perceptions of Plastic Surgery Practice in Brazil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About