1969
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(69)90983-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels in 15N resulting from the proton capture of 14C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ωγ can be derived from the present measurement, and compared to the literature (Table VII). The measured new resonance strength is in agreement with [33], but in disagreement with the values reported in [34,35] TABLE VII. Strength of the 527 keV proton resonance in 14 C(p,γ) 15 N reaction (Ex = 10.702 MeV).…”
Section: B Levels Above the Proton Separation Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ωγ can be derived from the present measurement, and compared to the literature (Table VII). The measured new resonance strength is in agreement with [33], but in disagreement with the values reported in [34,35] TABLE VII. Strength of the 527 keV proton resonance in 14 C(p,γ) 15 N reaction (Ex = 10.702 MeV).…”
Section: B Levels Above the Proton Separation Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The resonance strength in the 14 C(p,γ) 15 N reaction populating the 10.702-MeV level in 15 N was determined for the first time from a gamma scattering experiment, and found to be in agreement with a previous value [33], but in contradiction with others [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The observation of dipole plus quadrupole capture ?-rays to the ground state had led Bartholomew et aL [11] to a 3/2-assignment assuming M1/E2 radiation. The strongly anisotropic ?-ray angular distribution [11,12] immediately rules out a J= 1/2 assignment. Also the reported quadrupole admixtures are hardly compatible with the accepted 3/2 + assignment, since in this case one should expect only very weak M2 admixtures to the predominantly E1 contribution.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Earlier measurements for the two levels under study have been done by Hebbard and Dunbar [7] (HD-PR), Siefken et al [8] (SIE-NPA), and Beukens [9] (BEU-PhD); only a minor part of the Ph.D. thesis BEU-PhD has been published [10]. As there is no good agreement between the data by HD-PR, SIE-NPA, and BEU-PhD, and the unpublished data of BEU-PhD have been normalized to one particular resonance strength of SIE-NPA, we confirm to adopt the latest resonance strengths ωγ by GOE-NPA: ωγ(10702) = 840 ± 130 meV and ωγ(10804) = 270 ± 40 meV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%