2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-016-1461-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level Spacing for Non-Monotone Anderson Models

Abstract: We prove localization and probabilistic bounds on the minimum level spacing for a random block Anderson model without monotonicity. Using a sequence of narrowing energy windows and associated Schur complements, we obtain detailed probabilistic information about the microscopic structure of energy levels of the Hamiltonian, as well as the support and decay of eigenfunctions.Comment: 39 pages, 3 figures, minor updates for published version. To appear in Jour. Stat. Phy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at this point we lack the tools to adequately deal with such questions of level statistics. (For a step in this direction, see [36] for a proof of a level-spacing condition for a block Anderson model.) Nevertheless, LLA(ν, C) is a very mild assumption from the physical point of view, since random matrices normally have either neutral statistics (ν = 1, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at this point we lack the tools to adequately deal with such questions of level statistics. (For a step in this direction, see [36] for a proof of a level-spacing condition for a block Anderson model.) Nevertheless, LLA(ν, C) is a very mild assumption from the physical point of view, since random matrices normally have either neutral statistics (ν = 1, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physically, one expects to see satisfied with ν=1 in a localized phase (Poisson statistics) or with ν>1 in a thermalized phase (repulsive statistics). Although these bounds are expected to hold, the tools for proving them are not yet available in the many‐body context (see for a potentially useful approach in the one‐body context). We discuss in the following the main steps in the diagonalization procedure.…”
Section: Construction Of Conservation Laws: Analytic Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 < ν < 1. Mathematically, techniques to prove estimates such as (2) are not yet available for many-body systems, but a promising approach is available for singlebody Hamiltonians [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%