2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level-set topology optimization for effective control of transient conductive heat response using eigenvalue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach bears resemblances to the method suggested by Hyun and Kim (2021), which suggests the optimization of thermal response time with a substitute first eigenvalue maximization problem. However, substituting the initial value problem with an eigenvalue problem assumes that the fundamental eigenvalue is non-zero, which is not a requirement for the present formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our approach bears resemblances to the method suggested by Hyun and Kim (2021), which suggests the optimization of thermal response time with a substitute first eigenvalue maximization problem. However, substituting the initial value problem with an eigenvalue problem assumes that the fundamental eigenvalue is non-zero, which is not a requirement for the present formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This assumption significantly simplifies the physics modeling by omitting the need for time-domain analysis of the system associated with initial value problems (IVP). There are, however, a range of applications where controlling the transient behavior of the thermal system is essential to achieve the design goals; hence, solving the problem as an IVP in the time domain becomes necessary (Zhuang et al 2013;Zhuang and Xiong 2014;Xiong 2015, Madsen et al 2016;Long et al 2018;Wu et al 2019, Zeng et al 2020Wu et al 2021;Hyun and Kim 2021;and Sun et al 2023). Solving time-domain gradient-based optimization problems has the computational challenge of requiring both forward and backward time stepping at each iteration to compute adjoint sensitivities Rousselet 1999a and1999b;and Gu et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the diffuse-interface methods are often employed for topology optimization because of their simple formulations with the additional forcing terms [38]- [40]. Indeed, our previous studies demonstrate that VPM can be combined with the continuous adjoint method to conduct shape optimization for incompressible steady laminar flow [41], unsteady turbulent flows [42], and radiative heat transfer [43]. Therefore, it is interesting to extend the shape optimization algorithm based on VPM to compressible flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%