Object Recognition Supported by User Interaction for Service Robots
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2002.1044788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level-set evolution with region competition: automatic 3-D segmentation of brain tumors

Abstract: Abstract-This paper discusses the development of a new method for the automatic segmentation of anatomical structures from volumetric medical images. Driving application is the segmentation of 3-D tumor structures from magnetic resonance images (MRI), which is known to be a very challenging segmentation problem due to the variability of tumor geometry and intensity patterns. Level set evolution combining global smoothness with the flexibility of topology changes offers significant advantages over conventional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
133
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first set of manual segmentations is chosen as a gold standard for the purpose of evaluating the method. As another measure of performance, we also compared the manual segmentation results with the segmentations generated by a semi-automatic segmentation tool that uses levelset evolution (19). The semi-automatic segmentations are generated from the T1 contrast difference image with the user specifying the rough estimate of the tumor location by placing bubbles in the 3D volume.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first set of manual segmentations is chosen as a gold standard for the purpose of evaluating the method. As another measure of performance, we also compared the manual segmentation results with the segmentations generated by a semi-automatic segmentation tool that uses levelset evolution (19). The semi-automatic segmentations are generated from the T1 contrast difference image with the user specifying the rough estimate of the tumor location by placing bubbles in the 3D volume.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore necessary to impose a shape constraint on the tumor prior. To remove the thin, sharp features of the blood vessels we apply a region competition level-set evolution method (19). This constraint forces the structure within the tumor prior probabilities to be relatively smooth and blobby ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Spatial Atlasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral ventricular CSF was segmented using 3D snakes with region competition priors [15]. The snake was initialized near the ventricles and evolved based on the probability map for CSF, provided as input to the program.…”
Section: Tissue Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the state-of-the-art methods need to segment at least the lesion (excepting [7]). While this could be a limitation in some complex cases with infiltrating tumors or presence of edema, there exist automated methods that allow an accurate segmentation of a large range of lesions [16][17][18] (see [19] for a recent review of brain tumor segmentation algorithms). Voxel-based methods naturally avoid the problem of presegmenting functionally important brain structures (excepting the lesion) since they directly work on voxel intensities.…”
Section: Survey Of Registration Methods For Brain Mr Images With Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%