2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.71.064320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level densities of transitional Sm nuclei

Abstract: Experimentally determined level densities of the transitional isotopes 148,149,150,152 Sm at excitation energies below and around the neutron binding energy are compared with microcanonical calculations based on a Monte Carlo approach to noncollective level densities, folded with a collective enhancement estimated in the frame of the interacting boson model (IBM). The IBM parameters are adjusted so as to reproduce the low-lying discrete levels of both parities, with the exception of the odd-mass nucleus, 149 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E shell = E tot − E LDM where E tot is the experimental total binding energy [103] (or theory [100] if not available experimentally) and E LDM is the phenomenological binding energy of the spherical liquid drop given by The vibrational state density ω vib (E x , M, π) is then folded in with the incoherent particle-hole state density ω ph (E x , M, π) as was suggested in [104]. This folding procedure corresponds to the well known adiabatic approximation and implies that no coupling occurs between the vibrational excitations and the incoherent particle-hole excitations.…”
Section: Microscopic Combinatorial Level Densities (Hfbm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E shell = E tot − E LDM where E tot is the experimental total binding energy [103] (or theory [100] if not available experimentally) and E LDM is the phenomenological binding energy of the spherical liquid drop given by The vibrational state density ω vib (E x , M, π) is then folded in with the incoherent particle-hole state density ω ph (E x , M, π) as was suggested in [104]. This folding procedure corresponds to the well known adiabatic approximation and implies that no coupling occurs between the vibrational excitations and the incoherent particle-hole excitations.…”
Section: Microscopic Combinatorial Level Densities (Hfbm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have calculated E2 transition properties of 144−145 Nd in the framework of IBM-2. Even-even Sm [4,59,60,[65][66][67][68] and Ce [5,6,69,70] we show the B(E2;…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The second cause is due to the NLD behaviour at low energies. The introduction of low-lying collective discrete states within the pairing gap by a convolution of collective and single-particle states [10] should improve the situation. More reliable conclusions are expected after asymmetry NLD enhancements for both the inner and outer barriers are considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%