1969
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.182.1149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level Densities from Excitation Functions of Isolated Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we mentioned before, Vonach seems to underestimate the trend of level widths as a function of the excitation energy and as a consequence overestimates the level density; the evaluated level width of Behkami [22] calculated at the same energy of 20.4 MeV is four times greater than Vonach's width. Other evaluations of level densities in 60 Ni have been done by Huizenga [41] and Fisher [42]; their reported values agree with the systematics of Al-Quraishi [29]. Huizenga has studied reactions 59 Co͑p , ␣ 0,1,2 ͒ 56 Fe and 56 Fe͑p , ␣ 0 ͒ 59 Co with a 50 keV energy resolution, evaluating the NLD with the expression ⌫ / D 0, with a model that includes the Hausser-Feshbach equation, D J, , and the measured differential cross section to the residual nucleus d ab / d⍀.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Evaluations Level Density Systematmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we mentioned before, Vonach seems to underestimate the trend of level widths as a function of the excitation energy and as a consequence overestimates the level density; the evaluated level width of Behkami [22] calculated at the same energy of 20.4 MeV is four times greater than Vonach's width. Other evaluations of level densities in 60 Ni have been done by Huizenga [41] and Fisher [42]; their reported values agree with the systematics of Al-Quraishi [29]. Huizenga has studied reactions 59 Co͑p , ␣ 0,1,2 ͒ 56 Fe and 56 Fe͑p , ␣ 0 ͒ 59 Co with a 50 keV energy resolution, evaluating the NLD with the expression ⌫ / D 0, with a model that includes the Hausser-Feshbach equation, D J, , and the measured differential cross section to the residual nucleus d ab / d⍀.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Evaluations Level Density Systematmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15). It might have been possible that Huizenga [41] could have used the Vonach's [26] width as a reference in his evaluations of NLD in 60 Ni. If this were the case, then its level densities could be lower than the reported ones.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Evaluations Level Density Systematmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their algebraic formulas, obtaincd by invcrsc Within the worldwide used back-shifted Fermi gas Laplace transformation of the grand canonical partition func-(BSFG) level density model [10,11] the effective excitation tion for a Fermi gas with pairing interactions (but neglecting [2] at fixed effective total excitation energies of 0, 2, 4, and 7 MeV. Different nuclear charges are indicated by different symbols.…”
Section: Effective Total Excitation Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case the observation of such effect would be difficult -when looking to excitation functions for production of spallation residues -since this process would be superimposed upon the one -of much greater intensity -corresponding to the emission of individual nucleons not bound into an particle. For evaluating the state and level densities in decay rate expressions, the parameters suggested by Gadioli et al [14] in the framework of the back-shifted Fermi Gas Model [15,16] have been employed.…”
Section: Ill the Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%