Abstract:Operative vaginal delivery was a risk factor for levator injury in women with OASIs, and levator injury was associated with a weaker pelvic floor muscle contraction. Special attention is recommended for women with OASI and levator injury as they would be at high risk of future pelvic floor disorders. The benefits of implementation of an intensive, focused and structured pelvic floor rehabilitation program needs to be evaluated in these women. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
“…For proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter, the ICC of 0.81 for intrarater reliability indicates excellent reliability. The ICC (average of the three raters) of 0.82 implies excellent agreement between the raters in this population 25 , and is higher than the ICC (average of two raters) of 0.77 found in another recent publication 29 . The ICC (single measurement) of 0.61, providing information on the performance of the test in a clinical setting in which one examiner assesses one woman, is good, and the method is acceptable to use in such settings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…This high prevalence is in agreement with that in previous publications in women with pelvic organ prolapse scheduled for surgery 27,28 . Previous publications have found that women with major levator trauma had reduced pelvic floor contraction compared with those without trauma 6,29 . Additionally, in the present study, we found a 3-fold increased prevalence of major levator trauma among women with absent to weak contraction compared with those with moderate to strong contraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Most previous intra-and interrater reliability studies on ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction have compared measurements taken either at rest or on contraction 22,[30][31][32][33] , and only a few have compared the change between rest and contraction 29 . In the present study, the ICC was also found to be higher for absolute measurements than the proportional change between rest and contraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of correlation (r S ) between ultrasound measurements and MOS score was 0.52 for 2D AP diameter, 0.62 for 3D AP diameter and 0.47 for hiatal area (P < 0.001 for all). On the ultrasound contraction scale, proportional change in 2D levator 126 Nyhus et al hiatal AP diameter of < 1% corresponds to absent,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Conclusions Ultrasound seems to be an objective and reliable method for evaluation of pelvic floor muscle contraction. Proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter had the highest ICC and moderate correlation with MOS score assessed by vaginal palpation, and we constructed an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction based on this measure.…”
KEYWORDS: levator ani muscle; observer variation; pelvic organ prolapse; reproducibility of results; transperineal ultrasound; urinary incontinence CONTRIBUTION What are the novel findings of this work? Ultrasound is a reliable method for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction. The best results were for measurement of two-dimensional anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus, which had a moderate correlation with contraction assessed by palpation. We created an ultrasound contraction scale based on this measurement.
What are the clinical implications of this work?Ultrasound can be used in a clinical setting to assess pelvic floor muscle contraction. The ultrasound contraction scale can be used as a tool for its assessment in the investigation of pelvic floor disorders and to evaluate the effect of conservative treatment of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.
ABSTRACTObjectives To determine intra-and interrater reliability and agreement for ultrasound measurements of pelvic floor muscle contraction and to assess the correlation between ultrasound and vaginal palpation. We also aimed to develop an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction.Methods This was a cross-sectional study of 195 women scheduled for stress urinary incontinence (n = 65) or prolapse (n = 65) surgery or who were primigravid (n = 65). Pelvic floor muscle contraction was assessed by vaginal palpation using the Modified Oxford Scale Results Intrarater ICC was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85) for proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter. Interrater ICC was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) for proportional change in 2D AP diameter, 0.80 (95% CI, for proportional change in 3D AP diameter and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56-0.83) for proportional change in hiatal area. The prevalence of major levator injury was 22.6%. The strength of correlation (r S ) between ultrasound measurements and MOS score was 0.52 for 2D AP diameter, 0.62 for 3D AP diameter and 0.47 for hiatal area (P < 0.001 for all). On the ultrasound contraction scale, proportional change in 2D levator 126 Nyhus et al. hiatal AP diameter of < 1% corresponds to absent,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Conclusions Ultrasound seems to be an objective and reliable method for evaluation of pelvic floor muscle contraction. Proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter had the highest ICC and moderate correlation with MOS score assessed by vaginal palpation, and we constructed an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction based on this measure. Copyright
“…For proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter, the ICC of 0.81 for intrarater reliability indicates excellent reliability. The ICC (average of the three raters) of 0.82 implies excellent agreement between the raters in this population 25 , and is higher than the ICC (average of two raters) of 0.77 found in another recent publication 29 . The ICC (single measurement) of 0.61, providing information on the performance of the test in a clinical setting in which one examiner assesses one woman, is good, and the method is acceptable to use in such settings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…This high prevalence is in agreement with that in previous publications in women with pelvic organ prolapse scheduled for surgery 27,28 . Previous publications have found that women with major levator trauma had reduced pelvic floor contraction compared with those without trauma 6,29 . Additionally, in the present study, we found a 3-fold increased prevalence of major levator trauma among women with absent to weak contraction compared with those with moderate to strong contraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Most previous intra-and interrater reliability studies on ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction have compared measurements taken either at rest or on contraction 22,[30][31][32][33] , and only a few have compared the change between rest and contraction 29 . In the present study, the ICC was also found to be higher for absolute measurements than the proportional change between rest and contraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of correlation (r S ) between ultrasound measurements and MOS score was 0.52 for 2D AP diameter, 0.62 for 3D AP diameter and 0.47 for hiatal area (P < 0.001 for all). On the ultrasound contraction scale, proportional change in 2D levator 126 Nyhus et al hiatal AP diameter of < 1% corresponds to absent,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Conclusions Ultrasound seems to be an objective and reliable method for evaluation of pelvic floor muscle contraction. Proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter had the highest ICC and moderate correlation with MOS score assessed by vaginal palpation, and we constructed an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction based on this measure.…”
KEYWORDS: levator ani muscle; observer variation; pelvic organ prolapse; reproducibility of results; transperineal ultrasound; urinary incontinence CONTRIBUTION What are the novel findings of this work? Ultrasound is a reliable method for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction. The best results were for measurement of two-dimensional anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus, which had a moderate correlation with contraction assessed by palpation. We created an ultrasound contraction scale based on this measurement.
What are the clinical implications of this work?Ultrasound can be used in a clinical setting to assess pelvic floor muscle contraction. The ultrasound contraction scale can be used as a tool for its assessment in the investigation of pelvic floor disorders and to evaluate the effect of conservative treatment of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse.
ABSTRACTObjectives To determine intra-and interrater reliability and agreement for ultrasound measurements of pelvic floor muscle contraction and to assess the correlation between ultrasound and vaginal palpation. We also aimed to develop an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction.Methods This was a cross-sectional study of 195 women scheduled for stress urinary incontinence (n = 65) or prolapse (n = 65) surgery or who were primigravid (n = 65). Pelvic floor muscle contraction was assessed by vaginal palpation using the Modified Oxford Scale Results Intrarater ICC was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85) for proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter. Interrater ICC was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) for proportional change in 2D AP diameter, 0.80 (95% CI, for proportional change in 3D AP diameter and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56-0.83) for proportional change in hiatal area. The prevalence of major levator injury was 22.6%. The strength of correlation (r S ) between ultrasound measurements and MOS score was 0.52 for 2D AP diameter, 0.62 for 3D AP diameter and 0.47 for hiatal area (P < 0.001 for all). On the ultrasound contraction scale, proportional change in 2D levator 126 Nyhus et al. hiatal AP diameter of < 1% corresponds to absent,[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Conclusions Ultrasound seems to be an objective and reliable method for evaluation of pelvic floor muscle contraction. Proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter had the highest ICC and moderate correlation with MOS score assessed by vaginal palpation, and we constructed an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction based on this measure. Copyright
“…Our study population was comprised of both primiparous and multiparous women and showed a slightly lower incidence of levator avulsions analyzed with transperineal ultrasound (n = 17, 29%). A recent study also showed a 29% prevalence of levator avulsions in conjunction with OASIS, with instrumental delivery increasing the risk of levator injury fourfold 16. The downside of transperineal ultrasound, however, could beinsufficient sensitivity in detecting OASIS.…”
Introduction
Endoanal ultrasound is considered the gold standard when assessing the obstetric anal sphincter complex. Due to its relative intrusiveness and economic cost, other ultrasound modalities are on the rise, such as transperineal ultrasound with a convex probe. The aim of our study was to evaluate the agreement between endoanal ultrasound scores (EAUS score) and transperineal ultrasound scores (TPUS score) in assessing residual obstetric anal sphincter defects.
Material and methods
Fifty‐nine women were examined 6 months after primary suturing of obstetric anal sphincter injury with two ultrasound modalities. A standardized scoring system analyzing the length, depth and radial extent of both the external (EAS) and internal (IAS) sphincter was used. Wexner fecal incontinence score was used to assess the patients’ symptoms.
Results
Transperineal ultrasound scores score showed a strong significant correlation with EAUS score during both pelvic floor relaxation and contraction: Spearman's rho [rs] = 0.74, P < 0.001, and rs = 0.77, P < 0.001, respectively. For both EAS and IAS, significant correlations were found for all parameters, that is, length, depth and angle between both EAUS and TPUS. A statistically significant correlation was found between EAUS score and Wexner score (rs = 0.36, P = 0.005). A significant correlation between the EAS‐EAUS score (rs = 0.36, P = 0.005) and Wexner score was found, but no significance was found between IAS‐EAUS score and Wexner score (rs = 0.22, P = 0.097). Significant correlations were found for Wexner score and TPUS score in resting state (rs = 0.36, P = 0.01) and contracting state (rs = 0.28, P < 0.05), and between Wexner score and EAS‐TPUS score in resting state (rs = 0.32, P = 0.02).
Conclusions
The results indicated a strong agreement between endoanal and transperineal ultrasound in assessing residual obstetric anal sphincter defects 6 months after primary suturing. Furthermore, a weak significant correlation was found between the ultrasound scores and the patients’ Wexner fecal incontinence score.
ObjectivesWe herein evaluated the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) on postpartum pelvic floor function using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS).MethodsWe analyzed retrospectively the data from 228 primiparous women with singleton pregnancies who were evaluated for postpartum pelvic floor function between February 2022 and October 2022. According to the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines regarding GWG, subjects were separated into three groups: inadequate GWG, recommended GWG, and excessive GWG. All underwent TPUS 6–10 weeks postpartum to assess bladder neck descent between rest and Valsalva (BND), retrovesical angle at Valsalva (RVA), urethral rotation angle between rest and Valsalva (URA), the area of levator hiatus at Valsalva (LHA), and abnormal pelvic floor function. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to explore the association measures between GWG and the pelvic floor. A P‐value <.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsOf the 228 primiparous women, 113 (49.6%) showed excessive GWG. Univariate analysis revealed that there were no statistical differences in ultrasonic parameters of the pelvic floor among the three groups (P > .05). After adjusting for potential confounders and using the recommended GWG group as a reference group, inadequate GWG was significantly associated with BND ≥25 mm (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.14–0.93), and excessive GWG was significantly associated with uterine prolapse (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.13–6.92).ConclusionsGWG was associated with the ultrasonic parameters of the female pelvic floor in the early postpartum period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.