2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50474.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leuprolide‐Induced Myopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were decreased following 3 months of Lupron in women and, notably, this was not prevented with oestrogen replacement (44). As indicated earlier, a plethora of evidence suggests that GnRH treatment may be associated with an increased risk of cardiac dysfunction (1–3,45–47). Such phenomenon of compromised heart function accompanying GnRH therapy is usually attributed to the accompanying androgen deprivation (1–3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were decreased following 3 months of Lupron in women and, notably, this was not prevented with oestrogen replacement (44). As indicated earlier, a plethora of evidence suggests that GnRH treatment may be associated with an increased risk of cardiac dysfunction (1–3,45–47). Such phenomenon of compromised heart function accompanying GnRH therapy is usually attributed to the accompanying androgen deprivation (1–3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This has been observed, for example, in polymyositis caused by leuprolide depot injections for prostate cancer, but has not yet been studied as a potential cause of myositis ossificans or other soft tissue tumors with the use of anabolic steroids. 24 Although further investigation is warranted, myositis ossificans should be considered a complication of anabolic steroid injection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three previously published cases manifested with proximal myopathy. While the muscle biopsy in the first case showed diffuse T-lymphocyte infiltration of the muscle and was treated with steroids [12], the biopsy in the second case revealed only mild, non-specific changes [13]. In the third case, no biopsy was performed [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%