2018
DOI: 10.1172/jci97117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leukemogenic nucleophosmin mutation disrupts the transcription factor hub that regulates granulomonocytic fates

Abstract: Conflict of interest:CA and YL have ownership in KaryoPharm and YS has ownership in EpiDestiny. CA and YL receive income from KaryoPharm. YS hold patents involving tetrahydrouridine, decitabine, and 5-azacytidine (US patents 9,259,469 B2;9,265,785 B2;9,895,391 B2).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
4
115
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When NPM1c is experimentally shifted from the cytoplasm, H3K27Ac is reduced, particularly at HOX loci, and inhibition of KMT2A‐menin and DOT1L, which target H3K4 and H3K79 methylation, also leads to reduced HOX expression . NPM1c may also dysregulate transcriptional networks by binding and shuttling PU.1 out of the nucleus; restoration of nuclear PU.1 switched RUNX1 and CEBPA interactomes from repressive to activating complexes, suggesting that NPM1c can lead to altered nuclear TF complexes …”
Section: Network Disruption Via Transcription Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When NPM1c is experimentally shifted from the cytoplasm, H3K27Ac is reduced, particularly at HOX loci, and inhibition of KMT2A‐menin and DOT1L, which target H3K4 and H3K79 methylation, also leads to reduced HOX expression . NPM1c may also dysregulate transcriptional networks by binding and shuttling PU.1 out of the nucleus; restoration of nuclear PU.1 switched RUNX1 and CEBPA interactomes from repressive to activating complexes, suggesting that NPM1c can lead to altered nuclear TF complexes …”
Section: Network Disruption Via Transcription Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficacy reduction with dose reduction may not apply, however, to the nucleoside analogue decitabine, because it has a molecular‐targeted action of depleting DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) that occurs, and is saturated at, low decitabine concentrations (generally <1 μM). This molecular‐targeted action can cytoreduce p53‐null chemorefractory myeloid malignancies via terminal differentiation instead of apoptosis, simultaneously sparing normal haematopoiesis (Hu, et al , ; Hu et al , ; Ng et al , ; Negrotto et al , ; Tsai et al , ; Gu et al , ; Saunthararajah et al , ; Gu et al , ; Velcheti et al , ). Higher decitabine doses/concentrations (generally >1 μmol/l), by causing cytotoxicity, limit feasible exposure times for the S‐phase‐dependent DNMT1‐depleting effect, and can further compromise treatment goals by destroying normal haematopoietic cells.…”
Section: Pretreatment Characteristics Of Patients With Blood Count Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a decitabine regimen designed and previously demonstrated to be non‐cytotoxic yet DNMT1‐depleting in non‐human primates and humans (Saunthararajah et al , ; Olivieri et al , ; Lavelle et al , ; Saunthararajah et al , ) produced durable responses (follow‐up was for up to 6·5 years) in myeloid malignancies across the clinico‐pathologic spectrum of disease — that is, in patients with MDS, MDS/MPN overlap, MPN or AML and in disease containing diverse genetic abnormalities — consistent with scientific data implicating DNMT1 as a mutation‐agnostic target that operates in a final common pathway of myeloid transformation (Hu et al , ; Hu et al , ; Ng et al , ; Negrotto et al , ; Gu et al , ; Saunthararajah et al , ; Gu et al , ; Velcheti et al , ). Likewise, a broad spectrum of activity has been observed with standard intravenously infused regimens of decitabine [reviewed in Saunthararajah ()].…”
Section: Pretreatment Characteristics Of Patients With Blood Count Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CEBPA is frequently altered in MDS/MPN and AML by loss-of-function (LOF) mutations or by (epi)genetic alterations that suppress CEBPA expression, together accounting for ~70% of molecular alterations in de novo AML ( Fig. 1A, (Cancer Genome Atlas Research et al, 2013;Ernst et al, 2010;Gu et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2012;Pabst et al, 2001a;Perrotti et al, 2002;Zheng et al, 2004)). Further, Cebpa LOF leads to a block in myeloid differentiation, contributing to AML-like diseases in mouse models (Bereshchenko et al, 2009;Kirstetter et al, 2008;Pabst et al, 2001b;Porse et al, 2005;Zhang et al, 1997;Zhang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%