1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01050199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) de Wit) prunings as nitrogen source for maize (Zea mays L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil samples from beneath the reference trees afford L. leucocephala the opportunity to accumulate more water which explains for high freshweights detected from plant materials obtained from soil samples from beneath the reference trees (Table 3). The shoot and root dry weights of L. leucocephala plant materials obtained from soils from beneath S. siamea and L. leucocephala were found not to be significantly varied thus corroborating the fact that the L. leucocephala relatively has exceptional capacity to produce biomass, forage, wood and to improve soil fertility as reported by Kang et al (1981). This suggests that higher rhizobia population from L. leucocephala soils did not translate to high dry matter accumulation in Leucaena when compared with the biomass production in S. siamea.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Soil samples from beneath the reference trees afford L. leucocephala the opportunity to accumulate more water which explains for high freshweights detected from plant materials obtained from soil samples from beneath the reference trees (Table 3). The shoot and root dry weights of L. leucocephala plant materials obtained from soils from beneath S. siamea and L. leucocephala were found not to be significantly varied thus corroborating the fact that the L. leucocephala relatively has exceptional capacity to produce biomass, forage, wood and to improve soil fertility as reported by Kang et al (1981). This suggests that higher rhizobia population from L. leucocephala soils did not translate to high dry matter accumulation in Leucaena when compared with the biomass production in S. siamea.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is commonly practiced in many developing countries in the tropics where fertilizer use is limited due to economic reasons or unavailability (Kang & Wilson 1987;Kang 1988). Many researchers have indicated that plant residues from planted fallows or prunings from hedgerows in alley cropping systems can contribute significant quantities of nutrients to the associated crop (Kang et al 1981;Mulongoy & van der Meersch 1988). To better evaluate the potential of plant residues from planted fallow species as a nutrient source, more information is needed about their chemical composition and nutrient release patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly was the case of Bean, guaje (L. leucocephala) and legume pods mix with a BE of 125% and PR 5.0 and Erythrina americana flowers with a BE of 125% and 5.87 of PR, the evaluated period for production was the 25 and 23 days respectively. The first substrate includes the L. leucocephala, it is well known to have a high content of Nitrogen [40,41], and this can help to supply the nutrition of Pleurotus to increase the biomasse as mentioned earlier. This is the first report of the Erythrina americana flowers, used as a substrate for Pleurotus cultivation.…”
Section: Potential Of Substrates For Pleurotus Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%