Heidegger on Technology 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315561226-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letting Things Be for Themselves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their Introduction, the editors of the volume contrast Gestell and Gelassenheit as "opposing ideas in Heidegger's analysis of technology whereby the releasement characteristic of Gelassenheit counters the dangers of our technological framing of the world via Gestell" (Merwin, Wendland, Hadjioannou 2018, 1 -2). In the same volume, see alsoCrowell (2018) andKeiling (2018). However, if it is not assured that Gelassenheit, which is not an act of will, "releases us from the danger of technology"(Merwin, Wendland, Hadjioannou 2018, 9), the preliminary philosophical question is whether under the global dominance of technology called by Heidegger Gestell any releasement is possible, at all, and what should happen, or change, for that to be possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their Introduction, the editors of the volume contrast Gestell and Gelassenheit as "opposing ideas in Heidegger's analysis of technology whereby the releasement characteristic of Gelassenheit counters the dangers of our technological framing of the world via Gestell" (Merwin, Wendland, Hadjioannou 2018, 1 -2). In the same volume, see alsoCrowell (2018) andKeiling (2018). However, if it is not assured that Gelassenheit, which is not an act of will, "releases us from the danger of technology"(Merwin, Wendland, Hadjioannou 2018, 9), the preliminary philosophical question is whether under the global dominance of technology called by Heidegger Gestell any releasement is possible, at all, and what should happen, or change, for that to be possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%