Letter to the editor: Who’s doing your scan? A European perspective on ultrasound services by Edwards and Sidhu

Degiorgio, David; Mifsud, Melanie; Wolstenhulme, Stephen

doi:10.1055/s-0043-125330

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…10 There is much evidence to support the benefits to patients by the immediate reporting and communicating of results by sonographers 11 ; however, this is a debated topic both in Europe and the wider global community. 12 The ability for such in-depth and professional discussions to occur and be dissected by professionals on a global scale is unique to the online journal club and may inspire further progression with a patient-focused outlook.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the UK sonographers report autonomously as endorsed by the Society and College of Radiographers and BMUS, who provide advice for sonographers with regard to communicating findings to patients as well as example reports (10). There is much evidence to support the benefits to patients by the immediate reporting and communicating of results by sonographers (11), however this is a debated topic both in Europe and the wider global community (12). The ability for such in-depth and professional discussions to occur and be dissected by professionals on a global scale is unique to the online journal club and may inspire further progression with a patient-focused outlook.…”

Section: P R O O Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

BMUS journal club on Twitter: An analysis of the first #BMUS_JC discussions

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Journal clubs have evolved over recent years within healthcare to encourage continuing professional development. More recently, there has been a move from face-to-face group meetings to virtual groups utilising social media platforms. This article aims to explore the discussions and narrative following the inaugural BMUS journal club, highlighting the key discussions and themes from the participants and to provide a narrative for the future of ultrasound continuing professional development. Methods The August 2020 journal club chat was focussed on the article featured in Ultrasound: “Sonographers’ level of autonomy in communication in Australian obstetric settings: Does it affect their professional identity?” by Thomas et al. Data consisting of Twitter correspondence were extracted and analysed from the advanced search function on Twitter using #BMUS_JC thread. An initial review ensured related content was included. A second review and semantic thematic analysis was then conducted on the 123 tweets. Results In total, seven overall themes were identified between the three sub-threads within the journal club discussions. Those participating in the Twitter discussion recognised the limitations and barriers for communicating results to patients, acknowledging that training, support and regulatory involvement is required for sonographers to change practice locally and internationally. Conclusion The group discussions on Twitter highlight the ongoing issues for sonographers’ professional identity worldwide. Furthermore, our analysis echo other contemporary studies which indicate that Twitter journal clubs act as a fruitful and dynamic source of continuing professional development, particularly in an era where social distancing is encouraged. The outcomes of the first BMUS journal club support the wider evidence that online journal clubs can provide a successful platform for professional discussion and debate.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: P R O O Fmentioning

confidence: 99%