2021
DOI: 10.1002/hep.31511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor: Statins and COVID‐19: Efficacy Still to Be Proven

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, 24 eligible observational studies were identified that reported valuable data on in-hospital mortality and/or COVID-19 disease severity, including three studies of patients with diabetes [14] , [15] , [17] . Of these selected studies, 14 provided data on in-hospital mortality [15] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] ( Table 1 )—although one reported only adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with no crude numbers of deaths in statin users vs non-users and, therefore, could not be included in the meta-analysis (authors were contacted, but did not communicate their results) [26] —while 11 studies reported data on COVID-19 severity (as determined by ICU, IMV; Table 2 ) [18] , [22] , [23] , [27] , [28] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] . Also, a study by Tan et al [36] collected very few events in a Chinese population (personal communication from the authors), thereby preventing the use of this study in the final analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, 24 eligible observational studies were identified that reported valuable data on in-hospital mortality and/or COVID-19 disease severity, including three studies of patients with diabetes [14] , [15] , [17] . Of these selected studies, 14 provided data on in-hospital mortality [15] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] ( Table 1 )—although one reported only adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with no crude numbers of deaths in statin users vs non-users and, therefore, could not be included in the meta-analysis (authors were contacted, but did not communicate their results) [26] —while 11 studies reported data on COVID-19 severity (as determined by ICU, IMV; Table 2 ) [18] , [22] , [23] , [27] , [28] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] . Also, a study by Tan et al [36] collected very few events in a Chinese population (personal communication from the authors), thereby preventing the use of this study in the final analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of included observational studies reporting data on disease severity (ICU, IMV) is presented in Table 2 [18] , [22] , [23] , [27] , [28] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , while results of the corresponding meta-analysis are illustrated in Fig. 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably in this category of patients, routine use of statins may be additive in increasing hepatic injury. In addition, the COVID-19 patient taking antivirals may be subject to drug interactions; remdesivir and statins are both substrates of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), which could promote adverse effects with concomitant administration [ 91 ]. In addition, some other important questions need to be clarified: is there a dose–response relationship underlying the beneficial effect of statins in Covid-19?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%