Letter to the editor regarding “Is rod diameter associated with the rate of rod fracture in patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods?”

Reply to Tabeling et al. Comment on “Grabala et al. Radiological Outcomes of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis—A Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1529”

“…Table 1 comprises the radiological statistics of patients managed with MCGR, encompassing the final assessments before the conversion of MCGR to PSF, with the exception of the outcomes after the final surgery and PSF. These findings mirror the comparable accomplishments of other investigators [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Examination of the growth from T1–T12 and T1–S1 delineated the average growth rates for T1–T12 and T1–S1 during the treatment regimen as 5.95 mm and 10.1 mm per annum, respectively, in accordance with existing studies within the medical literature [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”