2015
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor: Production of Mature Healthy Hematopoietic Cells from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from an AML Diagnostic Sample Containing the t(8;21) Translocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the malignant genetic or cytogenetic transformations have shown to interfere in the reprogramming of disease cells. Attempts to reprogram cells from AML patients with high-risk translocations resulted in cytogenetically normal iPSCs [77,78] suggesting that not all genetic abnormalities can be preserved during reprogramming. This can be seen in relatively negligible reports of iPSC generations from fully malignant cells as compared to pre-malignant cells as in case of DS-ML and TMD.…”
Section: Disease Modeling Using Patient-derived Ipscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the malignant genetic or cytogenetic transformations have shown to interfere in the reprogramming of disease cells. Attempts to reprogram cells from AML patients with high-risk translocations resulted in cytogenetically normal iPSCs [77,78] suggesting that not all genetic abnormalities can be preserved during reprogramming. This can be seen in relatively negligible reports of iPSC generations from fully malignant cells as compared to pre-malignant cells as in case of DS-ML and TMD.…”
Section: Disease Modeling Using Patient-derived Ipscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iPSC lines derived did not harbor the translocation and were cytogenetically normal ( Yamasaki et al, 2019 ). Similarly, reprogramming an AML patient sample with a t(8;21) translocation resulted in only the successful reprogramming of cytogenetically normal iPSC lines ( Hoffmann et al, 2016 ). These studies provide further evidence that particular chromosomal abnormalities and point mutations are selected against during reprogramming.…”
Section: Barriers To Reprogrammingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AML cells appear to reprogram with even lower efficiency, presumably because of a higher burden of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities (Chao et al, 2017; Kotini et al, 2017; Hoffmann et al, 2016; Salci et al, 2015; Lee et al, 2017). Regardless, AML-iPSC lines have successfully been derived and studied.…”
Section: Ipsc Models Of Hematologic Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%