2018
DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.peds18282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor. Pediatric thalamic tumors

Abstract: Laminotomy outcomes in pediatric patients TO THE EDITOR: We read with keen interest the article by Arocho-Quinones et al. 1 comparing the outcomes of split laminotomy versus conventional laminotomy in pediatric patients (Arocho-Quinones EV, Kolimas A, LaViolette PS, et al: Split laminotomy versus conventional laminotomy: postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With EOR dichotomized as “> 95%” vs “< 95%,” the difference in 5-year OS was found to be statistically significant (79.8% vs 52%), although this did not hold on multivariate analysis, with only tumor grade (“low” vs “high”) remaining a predictive factor for survival. With no surgical mortality and permanent neurological worsening reported in 7/42 patients undergoing surgery, the authors are still cautious about advising to strive for GTR, with maximal safe resection as the reasonable goal [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With EOR dichotomized as “> 95%” vs “< 95%,” the difference in 5-year OS was found to be statistically significant (79.8% vs 52%), although this did not hold on multivariate analysis, with only tumor grade (“low” vs “high”) remaining a predictive factor for survival. With no surgical mortality and permanent neurological worsening reported in 7/42 patients undergoing surgery, the authors are still cautious about advising to strive for GTR, with maximal safe resection as the reasonable goal [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%