2000
DOI: 10.1086/384948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of reasons may be advanced for the apparent low impact of BINP: (1) spill-over effects from project areas to control undermine measured impact, (2) weaknesses in Levinson and Rohde, 2005;Sack et al, 2005) argue that word on BINP's success has spread so that similar programmes are being carried out in neighbouring thanas (the Save the Children study used thanas adjacent to project thanas for the control), or even that improved practices simply travel by word of mouth. However, these arguments can be discounted for three reasons.…”
Section: Explaining Low Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of reasons may be advanced for the apparent low impact of BINP: (1) spill-over effects from project areas to control undermine measured impact, (2) weaknesses in Levinson and Rohde, 2005;Sack et al, 2005) argue that word on BINP's success has spread so that similar programmes are being carried out in neighbouring thanas (the Save the Children study used thanas adjacent to project thanas for the control), or even that improved practices simply travel by word of mouth. However, these arguments can be discounted for three reasons.…”
Section: Explaining Low Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%