2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor: Lipid profile disturbances in antipsychotic-naive patients with first-episode non-affective psychosis

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP URL' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. The study by Błażej Misiak and colleagues (Misiak et al., 2017) provides evidence that antipsychoticnaïve patients with first-episode non-affective psychosis may present with subclinical d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not adjust for weak inhibitors as they have a much less clinically relevant impact on phenoconversion ( Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 2021 ) and are therefore not typically included when accounting for inhibitors ( Cicali et al, 2021 ). We did not adjust for BMI in order to avoid the risk of overadjustment bias ( Perry and Singh, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not adjust for weak inhibitors as they have a much less clinically relevant impact on phenoconversion ( Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 2021 ) and are therefore not typically included when accounting for inhibitors ( Cicali et al, 2021 ). We did not adjust for BMI in order to avoid the risk of overadjustment bias ( Perry and Singh, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 We did not adjust for BMI in order to avoid the risk of overadjustment bias. 36 Effect estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and uncorrected p values in tables and forest plots. Given analysis of three independent (LDL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides), and two highly correlated/combinatory (total cholesterol and TC:HDL ratio (the latter not included in pharmacogenetic analyses)), outcomes, we corrected for multiple testing by using an adjusted significance threshold of <0•013 (i.e., 0•05/4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%