2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291708004509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter to the Editor: A reply to Dr Corcoran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be pointed out that despite global disruptions of pragmatic speech comprehension found in a tested population of the clinical sample, some of the schizophrenia individuals presented seemingly intact pragmatic speech skills (i.e., number of erroneous answers at the level of CON mean). This indicates that such characteristics are related to individual differences, such as good cognitive skills (ACE-III), social functioning (outpatients vs inpatients), and/or work status, as can be concluded from previous literature ( Adamczyk et al, 2016 ; Kosmidis et al, 2008 ; Lee et al, 2009 , Lee et al, 2020 ; San et al, 2007 ; Polimeni et al, 2010 ; Tsoi et al, 2008 ). Therefore, such phenomena warrant further research aimed at those individual differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, it should be pointed out that despite global disruptions of pragmatic speech comprehension found in a tested population of the clinical sample, some of the schizophrenia individuals presented seemingly intact pragmatic speech skills (i.e., number of erroneous answers at the level of CON mean). This indicates that such characteristics are related to individual differences, such as good cognitive skills (ACE-III), social functioning (outpatients vs inpatients), and/or work status, as can be concluded from previous literature ( Adamczyk et al, 2016 ; Kosmidis et al, 2008 ; Lee et al, 2009 , Lee et al, 2020 ; San et al, 2007 ; Polimeni et al, 2010 ; Tsoi et al, 2008 ). Therefore, such phenomena warrant further research aimed at those individual differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%