2016
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter: hydroxypropyl cellulose as therapy for chronic diarrhoea in patients with bile acid malabsorption – possible mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…63 Although HPC was chosen as a placebo, it may be pharmacologically active, and a small case series suggested it may be effective in BAD. 63,64 The RCT was an 8-week study in 26 patients with chronic functional watery diarrhea or IBS-D, of which 77% of the cholestyramine-treated and 54% of HPC-treated patients had a SeHCAT retention rate of 10% or less. 63 There was no significant difference in clinical remission rates (defined as <3 bowel movements/d over 1 week, with <1 watery stool/d) between treatments (53.8% vs 38.4%; P ¼ .43).…”
Section: Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…63 Although HPC was chosen as a placebo, it may be pharmacologically active, and a small case series suggested it may be effective in BAD. 63,64 The RCT was an 8-week study in 26 patients with chronic functional watery diarrhea or IBS-D, of which 77% of the cholestyramine-treated and 54% of HPC-treated patients had a SeHCAT retention rate of 10% or less. 63 There was no significant difference in clinical remission rates (defined as <3 bowel movements/d over 1 week, with <1 watery stool/d) between treatments (53.8% vs 38.4%; P ¼ .43).…”
Section: Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was a significant improvement in the decrease in watery stools per day (-92.4% AE 3.5% vs -75.8% AE 7.1%; P ¼ .048). Because HPC binds bile acids and may have a bulking effect, it may have some efficacy for BAD [63][64][65][66] ; this makes it difficult to interpret the lack of significant differences in clinical remission rates with HPC compared with cholestyramine.…”
Section: Gradementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HPC has previously been shown to adsorb bile acids, suggesting a possible mechanism for this effect (256,302,386). Interestingly, HPC does not appear to increase serum C4, indicating that it may allow for some retention of bile acid signaling while also limiting their effect on colonic secretion (53).…”
Section: Treatment Of Badmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In comparison, the placebo hydroxypropyl cellulose group showed response rates of 25% and 38.5% respectively (no statistical difference between the two treatments) [26]. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the decreased number of watery stools with cholestyramine compared to hydroxypropyl cellulose, which also binds bile salts in the colon without affecting hepatic BA synthesis [27]. Eleven percent of the cholestyramine group had to discontinue treatment because of side effects and unpalatability [28].…”
Section: Treatments For Bile Acid Diarrheamentioning
confidence: 99%