2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1012013809911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LETTER: Cosmological Constant, Conical Defect and Classical Tests of General Relativity

Abstract: We investigate the perihelion shift of the planetary motion and the bending of starlight in the Schwarzschild field modified by the presence of a Λ-term plus a conical defect. This analysis generalizes an earlier result obtained by Islam (Phys. Lett. A 97, 239, 1983) to the case of a pure cosmological constant. By using the experimental data we obtain that the parameter ǫ characterizing the conical defect is less than 10 −9 and 10 −7 , respectively, on the length scales associated with such phenomena. In part… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The argument for the non-influence of Λ was apparently first made in [9] and has been re-made and reaffirmed by other authors, see for example [10,11,12,13,14]. The common basis of their arguments is that, in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric (first derived by Kottler [15]), which applies when Λ is included, Λ nevertheless drops out of the exact r, φ differential equation for a light path (null geodesic).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The argument for the non-influence of Λ was apparently first made in [9] and has been re-made and reaffirmed by other authors, see for example [10,11,12,13,14]. The common basis of their arguments is that, in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric (first derived by Kottler [15]), which applies when Λ is included, Λ nevertheless drops out of the exact r, φ differential equation for a light path (null geodesic).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…(17) in [9] and Eq. (22) in [10]. The orbit that is usually discussed is a small perturbation of the undeflected straight line in flat space r sin(φ) = R…”
Section: The Geometry and The Bending Of Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result made a correction to the question (see e.g. [5,6,7,8,9]) and was confirmed in [10,11,12]. Next, in reference [4], the authors brought the result into an observational context and used an exact solution construction where a Schwarzschild-de Sitter vacuole was embedded into a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) background, and where a Λ-term was added to the deflection angle within the broadly used lens equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…therein). Indeed, one of the most elegant methods for describing geodesics and orbits of test particles in Schwarzchild and Kerr spacetimes, as well as for any stationary gravitational configuration, is provided by the relativistic HJ equation [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%