2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter-by-letter processing in the phonological conversion of multiletter graphemes: Searching for sounds in printed pseudowords

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GPC shows significant effect on (a) behavior with more accurate responses for S than for C and (b) the cerebral network with specific activation of superior temporal gyrus for S and of inferior temporal gyrus for C. Our results are in agreement with those provided by other studies which manipulated GPC level (S vs. C) at the phoneme level Crossman & Polich, 1988;Peereman, Brand, & Rey, 2006;Tremblay et al, 2004). Our behavioral results show that processing of simple graphemes induces more accurate responses than complex graphemes.…”
Section: Effect Of Gpc: Regions Modulated By Simple and Complex Itemssupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The GPC shows significant effect on (a) behavior with more accurate responses for S than for C and (b) the cerebral network with specific activation of superior temporal gyrus for S and of inferior temporal gyrus for C. Our results are in agreement with those provided by other studies which manipulated GPC level (S vs. C) at the phoneme level Crossman & Polich, 1988;Peereman, Brand, & Rey, 2006;Tremblay et al, 2004). Our behavioral results show that processing of simple graphemes induces more accurate responses than complex graphemes.…”
Section: Effect Of Gpc: Regions Modulated By Simple and Complex Itemssupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Hence, while children have to understand that letters or letter groups (graphemes) correspond to phonemes, characteristics of their language can drive them to use both small and large unit recoding strategies in parallel. In agreement with such a view, experimental evidence supports the claim of activation of multiple levels of units in written word processing in adults (e.g., Carreiras, Alvarez, & de Vega, 1993;Peereman, Brand, & Rey, 2006;Ziegler & Perry, 1998).…”
Section: Print To Sound Mappingsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this sense, our results are compatible with studies showing activation of complex grapheme constituents. For example, in a letter detection task, Peereman, Brand, and Rey (2006) found that single letters are converted into their respective sounds when they form multi-letter graphemes. In their study, participants had to detect phonemes in visually presented nonwords.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%