2021
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letermovir prophylaxis in T-cell–depleted transplants: breakthrough and rebound infections in the postmarketing setting

Abstract: Conflict of interest: COI declared -see note COI notes: V.M. received research grants from MSD/ Gilead and speakership from MSD, Gilead, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Incyte. E.T. declares advisory boards for Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer and MSD, speaker fees for Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Jazz, Novartis and Pfizer and consultancy for educational materials for Gilead/Kite. A.P. declares advisory board for MSD. R.L. received educational grants and speaker fees for MSD, Chugai Pharma, Astellas, Gilead, Sano… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with prior studies reporting that the risk of late csCMVi occurs within a few weeks after prophylaxis discontinuation. 11 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 29 , 30 Accordingly, as suggested by others, 30 and regardless of prophylaxis duration, viremia monitoring is warranted for approximately the first 8 weeks after discontinuing letermovir; intensive monitoring for an extended period after cessation is likely not necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is consistent with prior studies reporting that the risk of late csCMVi occurs within a few weeks after prophylaxis discontinuation. 11 , 18 , 21 , 22 , 29 , 30 Accordingly, as suggested by others, 30 and regardless of prophylaxis duration, viremia monitoring is warranted for approximately the first 8 weeks after discontinuing letermovir; intensive monitoring for an extended period after cessation is likely not necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The efficacy of letermovir prophylaxis in reducing the risk of csCMVi after HSCT is well established. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 27 However, high rates of late csCMVi have been observed when letermovir prophylaxis is limited to the first 100 days’ posttransplant, especially in high-risk patient groups such as HLA-disparate donor recipients. 11 , 22 A single-center analysis has shown that extending prophylaxis duration beyond 100 days is highly effective in preventing csCMVi in patients with GVHD, another high-risk patient group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In summary, this novel approach has the potential to reduce the use of letermovir prophylaxis, overcoming breakthrough resistant viremia, 8,74 delays and deficits in T cell reconstitution, 12 and limit morbidity associated with high rates of CMV viremia rebound, requiring toxic antiviral treatment. 9,75…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%