2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13394-019-00278-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Let us discuss math”; Effects of shift‐problem lessons on mathematical discussions and level raising in early algebra

Abstract: We investigated whether early algebra lessons that explicitly aimed to elicit mathematical discussions (shift-problem lessons) invoke more and qualitatively better mathematical discussions and raise students’ mathematical levels more than conventional lessons in a small group setting. A quasi-experimental study (pre- and post-test, control group) was conducted in 6 seventh-grade classes (N = 160). An analysis of the interaction processes of five student groups showed that more mathematical discussions occurred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1 writes that the width of the playing page is − 2 which is not correct because − 2 should be the width of the gardening yard, while the width of the playing page is three times wider than the gardening yard. This error causes an incorrect result for question number 1, in line with previous research that substitution errors often occur, resulting in calculation errors even though the steps being carried out are correct (Calor et al, 2020;Islamiyah & Prayitno, 2017).…”
Section: Subject With Low Mathematical Resilience (S3)supporting
confidence: 82%
“…S1 writes that the width of the playing page is − 2 which is not correct because − 2 should be the width of the gardening yard, while the width of the playing page is three times wider than the gardening yard. This error causes an incorrect result for question number 1, in line with previous research that substitution errors often occur, resulting in calculation errors even though the steps being carried out are correct (Calor et al, 2020;Islamiyah & Prayitno, 2017).…”
Section: Subject With Low Mathematical Resilience (S3)supporting
confidence: 82%
“…In particular, when multiple external representations are used to support learners in complex information processing or constructing deep understanding of new concepts, the translation between representations must explicitly be scaffolded in the learning process and cannot be taken for granted. These insights are in line with mathematics education research emphasizing the need to initiate processes of deliberately translating between representations (Calor et al, 2020;Duval, 2006;Lesh, 1979).…”
Section: Connecting Rather Than Translating As a Relevant Student Pro...supporting
confidence: 72%
“…There has been wide practical consensus about the relevance of using and connecting multiple representations (Calor et al, 2020;Lesh, 1979;Moschkovich, 2013;NCTM, 2014), and a strong research tradition focusing on students' processes in dealing with representations (Ainsworth, 2006;Falcade et al, 2007;Renkl et al, 2013), including interactionist classroom studies showing that new visual representations require a careful negotiation of meanings (Meira, 1998;Steinbring, 2005). However, teaching with multiple representations has received much less research attention (Bossé et al, 2011;Dreher & Kuntze, 2015;Stylianou, 2010), so our aim was to decompose the teaching practices in detail.…”
Section: Results In Decomposing the Teaching Practices Of Dealing Wit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data relating to the spoken and written words and students' behavior were gathered from observation (Creswell, 2012). To choose the subject of the study, 34 candidates in V grades were asked to pose a mathematical problem which was analyzed based on problem complexity based on Calor et al (2019) as in the following Table 1. Representational Complexity The solution can be represented using diagrams or graphics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%