2011
DOI: 10.1080/0361526x.2011.556033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Let the Patron Drive: Purchase on Demand of E-books

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some McGraw-Hill e-books have a lifetime limit on the number of page views, generally equal to four times the number of pages in the book—‘so in a 100-page book, a reader can look at one page 400 times, say, or all the pages four times’ (Carlson, 2005). Nabe et al (2011) note that even multi-user e-book licenses sometimes limit the amount of content that can be viewed by any particular user. Other common restrictions include limits on the number of pages that can be viewed during a single session.…”
Section: Restrictions On the Use Of E-books By Library Patronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some McGraw-Hill e-books have a lifetime limit on the number of page views, generally equal to four times the number of pages in the book—‘so in a 100-page book, a reader can look at one page 400 times, say, or all the pages four times’ (Carlson, 2005). Nabe et al (2011) note that even multi-user e-book licenses sometimes limit the amount of content that can be viewed by any particular user. Other common restrictions include limits on the number of pages that can be viewed during a single session.…”
Section: Restrictions On the Use Of E-books By Library Patronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These papers share processes for putting PDA in place, specific parameters and customizations, and often, assessment data. Though some focus on the development of consortial PDA programs (Lupton, 2011;McElroy & Hinken, 2011), others are single-library programs (Steiner & Berry, 2011;Corbett, 2011;Reynolds et al, 2010;Hodges, Preston, & Hamilton, 2010;Spitzform, 2011;Levine-Clark, 2010;Nabe & Imre, 2011). Given the rapid pace of change in this area of collections work, details about PDA programs are quickly outdated (see Polanka, 2009;Macicak & Schell, 2009), making this literature less useful as a blueprint for PDA than as examples of the extent of customization possible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There have been numerous trials and studies of collection-building initiatives in academic libraries that allow patron requests to play a more dominant role in collection development (see, for example, Levine-Clark, 2010;Sharp & Thompson, 2010;Nabe et al, 2011;Hodges et al, 2012). The various studies demonstrate differences in vendor selection, triggering mechanisms (number of uses) for purchases, selection criteria for inclusion in the collection, format of titles (print or electronic or both), pricing limitations on titles available for selection, and models for funding the programs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%