Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1995
DOI: 10.2307/796992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Let the Money Do the Monitoring: How Institutional Investors Can Reduce Agency Costs in Securities Class Actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also dealing with a better control of lawyers in the field of securities class actions, the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (P.S.L.R.A.) of 1995 introduced the lead plaintiff provision that encourages the monitoring of lawyers by financial institutions, for the profit of all class members (Choi and Thompson 2006;Weiss and Beckerman 1995). The bet behind the P.S.L.R.A.…”
Section: Free Riding In Class Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also dealing with a better control of lawyers in the field of securities class actions, the US Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (P.S.L.R.A.) of 1995 introduced the lead plaintiff provision that encourages the monitoring of lawyers by financial institutions, for the profit of all class members (Choi and Thompson 2006;Weiss and Beckerman 1995). The bet behind the P.S.L.R.A.…”
Section: Free Riding In Class Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of statistical inference based on a large sample, an assertion is only conjecture. In addition, Alexan-( ) der 1991 is fatally flawed by other, highly significant, methodological ( shortcomings Simon & Dato, 1996;Weiss & Beckerman, 1995;Cox, ) 1997;Seligman, 1994 . As discussed above, the Reform Act debate was comprised of two separate but related subsidiary debates. First, Reform Act proponents asserted that management generally was not culpable and therefore many of the lawsuits should not have been filed.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, '[a]ny showing that severs the link between the alleged misrepresentation and either the price received (or paid) by the plaintiff or his decision to trade at a fair market price will be sufficient to rebut the presumption of reliance' (Basic, 248). However, in practice it was almost impossible for defendants to successfully rebut the presumption (Weiss andBeckerman 1995, 2077). Milton Friedman argued in 1953 that '[T]he relevant question to ask about the "assumptions" of a theory is not whether they are descriptively "realistic," for they never are, but whether they are sufficiently good approximations for the purpose in hand.…”
Section: I2) From Basic To Halliburton and Beyond: The Jurists' Apprmentioning
confidence: 99%