2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10566-014-9257-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Let’s Erase the Stigma (LETS): A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Adolescent-Led School Groups Intended to Reduce Mental Illness Stigma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often the result of misinterpreted information, which leads people to negatively perceive those living with mental illness . Such negative perceptions commonly illicit pessimistic expectations and discrimination, and represent a fundamental social injustice (Murman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often the result of misinterpreted information, which leads people to negatively perceive those living with mental illness . Such negative perceptions commonly illicit pessimistic expectations and discrimination, and represent a fundamental social injustice (Murman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is not really enough to raise empathy, change fundamental attitudes, or reduce social distance with people with disabilities. The journal "Let's Erase the Stigma (LETS): Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Youth School Groups Intended to Reduce Mental Stigma" suggests that discussion-oriented and action-oriented interventions may provide the new value of reducing stigma (Murman et al, 2014). LETS program provides a continuous dialogue in an interactive to discuss issues related to ''difference'' (including mental illness) and effect change strategies, with the overall aim of promoting de-stigmatization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interventions may involve seminars with factual information and videotaped cases, as such interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in improving attitudes toward ME and CFS (Friedberg et al, 2008). Peer-led approaches may be most successful at combatting stigma, so interventions may emphasize the importance of participant research and bringing in guests with lived experience (Murman et al, 2014). In addition to developing a consensus on the name and research case definition, which would reduce some of the ambiguity that professionals have with ME and CFS (Jason et al, 2018), there is also a need to develop treatment interventions that are not stigmatizing to patients, such as pacing and learning to stay within one’s energy envelope (Jason et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%