2019
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LET response variability of Gafchromic EBT3 film from a Co calibration in clinical proton beam qualities

Abstract: Purpose To establish a method of accurate dosimetry required to quantify the expected linear energy transfer (LET) quenching effect of EBT3 film used to benchmark the dose distribution for a given treatment field and specified measurement depth. In order to facilitate this technique, a full analysis of film calibration which considers LET variability at the plane of measurement and as a function of proton beam quality is demonstrated. Additionally, the corresponding uncertainty from the process was quantified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative effectiveness (RE) was introduced to quantify the LET quenching effect . In literature RE is mostly defined either as the ratio of the absorbed dose to water, Dw, and the film dose, Dfilm, required to yield the same effect RE=|DfilmDw,Qiso-effect=D(oQ0|pQ)D(oQ0|pQ0),or as the ratio of Dw and the apparent film dose, Dw,normalapparent, applying the parameters obtained at Q0 RE=|Dw,normalapparentDw,Qiso-dose=D(oQ|pQ0)D(oQ0|pQ0).Those two definitions are fundamentally different and cannot be mutually exchanged due to the nonlinear dependency of dose and net optical density [Eq. ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative effectiveness (RE) was introduced to quantify the LET quenching effect . In literature RE is mostly defined either as the ratio of the absorbed dose to water, Dw, and the film dose, Dfilm, required to yield the same effect RE=|DfilmDw,Qiso-effect=D(oQ0|pQ)D(oQ0|pQ0),or as the ratio of Dw and the apparent film dose, Dw,normalapparent, applying the parameters obtained at Q0 RE=|Dw,normalapparentDw,Qiso-dose=D(oQ|pQ0)D(oQ0|pQ0).Those two definitions are fundamentally different and cannot be mutually exchanged due to the nonlinear dependency of dose and net optical density [Eq. ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal linearity to increasing doses was assessed by the percent difference of the maximum residual following a linear fit optimized using a trust‐region method default to MATLAB’s fit function. The relative profile from the EBT3 film was converted from netΔOD following the methods of Smith et al 20 and is plotted in Fig. 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a secondary check was performed to first benchmark the lateral profile measurements of the Lynx to the profiles measured with Gafchromic ® EBT3 film. While EBT3 film has been shown to have a non‐linear sensitivity quenching response for high LET radiations, 18,19 previous work has shown the quenching effect to be constant with change in optical density and thus a suitable dosimeter for relative dosimetry 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several detector types used in proton dosimetry for therapeutic applications, such as plastic and inorganic scintillators, gel detectors and Gafchromic films, have a response that shows some level of dependence on the proton energy [ 18 ]. For example, LET response variability of Gafchromic EBT3 film from a Co-60 calibration in clinical proton beam qualities is demonstrated in [ 19 , 20 ]. The effect is particularly visible when such detectors are employed to measure the dose-depth curves of quasi-mono-energetic proton beams, which then exhibit a less pronounced peak dose compared to ionization chamber measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%