2002
DOI: 10.1177/003802610205000403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lest Power be Forgotten: Networks, Division and Difference in the City

Abstract: Over the last decade we have seen a notable shift in the urban sociology literature from discourses of division to discourses of difference. This shift has opened up new ways of understanding the complexities of city life and the formation of heterogeneous subjectivities and identities in the spaces of the city. There has been, we argue, a worrying tendency in this process to lose an analysis of the workings of power. While early Marxist, feminist and race/ethnicity debates were firmly located within a framewo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding speaks to existing literature on networks of identity and power within urban areas (Bridge & Watson, 2002), effects of socioeconomic status on social capital and support networks (Bagnall, Longhurst, & Savage, 2003), the creation of ''local social neighborhoods'' through overlapping or global networks (Pattison & Robins, 2002) and relationships between gender and the nature of social network support (Wellman & Wortley, 1990).…”
Section: Current Overall Quality Of Lifesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This finding speaks to existing literature on networks of identity and power within urban areas (Bridge & Watson, 2002), effects of socioeconomic status on social capital and support networks (Bagnall, Longhurst, & Savage, 2003), the creation of ''local social neighborhoods'' through overlapping or global networks (Pattison & Robins, 2002) and relationships between gender and the nature of social network support (Wellman & Wortley, 1990).…”
Section: Current Overall Quality Of Lifesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It almost goes without saying that public spaces, particularly spaces designated for leisure, are gendered, sexualized and racialized arenas (e.g., Scraton 1994;Scraton and Watson 1998;Skeggs 1999;Valentine 1989;Green and Singleton 2006). To the extent that public leisure spaces can contribute to the harmony of myriad social actors, they can also be contested arenas, sites where unequal power relations are negotiated (Aitchison 2001;Bridge and Watson 2002;Keith 2005;Skeggs 1999;Wearing 1998). In other words, 'individuals interested in leisure cannot ignore the control of space, the segregation of space and the effective exclusion of certain social groups from certain leisure spaces and places at particular times' (Henderson and Frelke 2000, 23).…”
Section: Participating In Public Leisure Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban life is viewed as the context in which identities are encountered, created and contested through a wide range of everyday spatial practices, enabling migrants and ethnic minorities to negotiate from ‘bottom‐up’ the complex politics of citizenship and identity (Nagel and Staeheli, 2004; Secor, 2004). In this literature, urban citizenship is thus seen essentially in a positive light, because it is assumed that the vibrant character of urban everyday life provides ideal conditions for the formation of inter‐ and cross‐cultural identities (McDowell, 1999; Sennett, 1999; Rogers, 2000; Bridge and Watson, 2002).…”
Section: Re‐scaling Multiculturalism: the Rise Of Cities As Sites Formentioning
confidence: 99%