2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned When Introducing Pharmacogenomic Panel Testing into Clinical Practice

Abstract: New, large-scale endeavors in health care are challenging. A description of the challenges that we encountered and the approaches that we adopted to address them may provide insights for those who implement and study innovations in other health care systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physicians also described test cost incurred by the patient (as many insurance companies will not cover testing) as one of the most significant barriers to PGx testing. Several other studies have highlighted cost as a barrier as well [15,35,43,44]. Following this feedback, this health system implemented cost strategies that make pricing more accessible to patients.…”
Section: Re Sending Their Cheek Cells Off That Their Dna Is Getting Smentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physicians also described test cost incurred by the patient (as many insurance companies will not cover testing) as one of the most significant barriers to PGx testing. Several other studies have highlighted cost as a barrier as well [15,35,43,44]. Following this feedback, this health system implemented cost strategies that make pricing more accessible to patients.…”
Section: Re Sending Their Cheek Cells Off That Their Dna Is Getting Smentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Guidelines have become available for a number of medications with applicable PGx testing through the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium [7][8][9]. Although physicians may perceive a benefit to using PGx [3,5,[9][10][11][12], many barriers exist that have prevented implementation on a larger scale such as: physicians lacking sufficient knowledge and finding time to keep up-to-date; uncertainty surrounding clinical utility; lack of confidence or comfort in ordering PGx testing; lack of comfort interpreting results; uncertainty in how to communicate results to patients and having sufficient time to do so; difficulty in managing changes to workflow; determining how to incorporate results into the electronic medical record (EMR); and uncertainty about level of coverage by insurance and reimbursement [3,5,6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacists should play a key role in patient education initiatives including in‐person, telephone, or telemedicine counseling to explain pharmacogenomic test results to patients. Additional tools to provide patient education may include web‐based educational videos, letters/pamphlets, and integrated patient portals . As testing for genetic variants that are predictive of both drug response and disease risk evolves, pharmacists should collaborate with genetic counselors to enable a broader scope of genomics education.…”
Section: Pharmacogenomics Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to realize that collaborative practice agreement laws between licensed physicians and pharmacists, physician assistants, and nurses are already in existence, but remains un-addressed for medical school graduates who choose only to specialize and train in clinical pharmacology. Therefore, if nothing is done, national implementation of precision medicine remains a challenge, due to not having enough trained medical doctors who focus on implementing pharmacogenomics into patient care and contribute to pharmacogenomics education ( McCauley et al , 2017 ; Rosenman et al , 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%