2020
DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned From Two Survivors of Greater Than 90% TBSA Full-Thickness Burn Injuries Using NovoSorb Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix™ and Autologous Skin Cell Suspension, RECELL™: A Case Series

Abstract: Since autologous split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) are scarce and lab skin growth requires a significant amount of time, there are limited available treatment approaches for patients with full thickness >90% total burn surface area (TBSA). Additionally, to achieve the primary goal of skin coverage and resuscitation, there must exist a balance between fluid loss and metabolic derangement. Allografts and xenografts have traditionally been used early in the process to achieve these goals. Currently, nove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages of this innovative technique included point of care preparation in the OR, short learning curve for the surgical team, in vivo confluence of the grafted keratinocytes, simplified dressing and wound care, early patient mobilization, and significantly decreased cost ($7500 per 1920 cm 2 application, or $3.9/cm 2 ). Multiple refinements and applications have been reported in abundant cases series since then, [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] including the use of ASCS in pediatric patients, the utility of ASCS in wounds other than burns, the efficacy of ASCS in FT defects, and success of ASCS when used with other technologies, such as tissue glue and negative pressure wound therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of this innovative technique included point of care preparation in the OR, short learning curve for the surgical team, in vivo confluence of the grafted keratinocytes, simplified dressing and wound care, early patient mobilization, and significantly decreased cost ($7500 per 1920 cm 2 application, or $3.9/cm 2 ). Multiple refinements and applications have been reported in abundant cases series since then, [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] including the use of ASCS in pediatric patients, the utility of ASCS in wounds other than burns, the efficacy of ASCS in FT defects, and success of ASCS when used with other technologies, such as tissue glue and negative pressure wound therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancements at burn facilities have improved mortality rates in patients with greater than 30% TBSA [ 19 ]. Patients with FT burns pose significant challenges including infection, dermal coverage, and management of medical comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical results document significant improvement in cosmetic appearance and mitigated wound contraction. Specific to severe burns, the BTM serves as a financially reasonable option for large surface area coverage that adequately prevents fluid loss and is less sensitive to infection than other dermal substitutes 70 . While more investigation is still required, these initial reports of the NovoSorb® BTM demonstrate its efficacy as a biodegradable PU scaffold for tissue regeneration.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Biodegradable Pu Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%