2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01737-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned from the Usability Evaluation of a Simulated Patient Dialogue System

Abstract: Simulated consultations through virtual patients allow medical students to practice history-taking skills. Ideally, applications should provide interactions in natural language and be multi-case, multi-specialty. Nevertheless, few systems handle or are tested on a large variety of cases. We present a virtual patient dialogue system in which a medical trainer types new cases and these are processed without human intervention. To develop it, we designed a patient record model, a knowledge model for the history-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this requires the integration of sophisticated applications to enable speech recognition. Recent developments in natural language processing in virtual standardized patients only demonstrated a response accuracy of 74-92% in dialogs [34,35]. Especially in the management of emergencies, even higher levels of precision might prove mandatory, in order to prevent the misconception of information under time pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this requires the integration of sophisticated applications to enable speech recognition. Recent developments in natural language processing in virtual standardized patients only demonstrated a response accuracy of 74-92% in dialogs [34,35]. Especially in the management of emergencies, even higher levels of precision might prove mandatory, in order to prevent the misconception of information under time pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this requires the integration of sophisticated applications to enable speech recognition. Recent developments in natural language processing in virtual standardized patients only demonstrated a response accuracy of 74-92% in dialogues [34,35]. Especially in the management of emergencies, even higher levels of precision might prove mandatory, in order to prevent the misconception of information under time pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VP systems can provide explicit medical skills training recommended for health professionals' education to reduce the impact of future diagnostic errors and potential patient harm Cleland et al, 2009;Balogh et al, 2015. Several research projects are investigating the use of VP systems in the education of medical students Campillos-Llanos et al, 2020;Pantziaras et al, 2015;Mavrogiorgou et al, 2022;Graf et al, 2023b. Thereby, the art of VPs can vary from chatbots Cameron et al (2019) to embodied conversation virtual agents Campillos-Llanos et al, 2020;Pantziaras et al, 2015. They can be accessible via different devices like computers Pantziaras et al, 2015;Campillos-Llanos et al, 2020or VR headsets Mavrogiorgou et al, 2022Graf et al, 2023b. Several review articles have investigated the effectiveness of VP systems over the past years Cook et al, 2010;Milne-Ives et al, 2020;McGaghie et al, 2010;Plackett et al, 2022;Kocaballi et al, 2019;Isaza-Restrepo et al, 2018.…”
Section: Learning Effects Of Virtual Patient Systems In Medical Educa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extended reality systems like VR have become increasingly relevant as a means for medical education Kononowicz et al, 2015, Kononowicz et al, 2019Campillos-Llanos et al, 2020;Pantziaras et al, 2015;Mavrogiorgou et al, 2022;Graf et al, 2023b. Utilizing its high degree of sensory immersion and natural interaction affordances, VR enables the simulation of face-to-face interaction scenarios within an adaptive learning environment that is cost-effective, scalable, and applicable in a standardized way for different learners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%