2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned From the First Human Low-Field MRI Guided Radiation Therapy of the Heart in the Presence of an Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the recent success of treating VT secondary to cardiac fibroma, we report the first use of SBRT for the treatment of refractory VT secondary to cardiac lipoma. The short‐term outcome in this case suggests that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment option for this type of arrhythmia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the recent success of treating VT secondary to cardiac fibroma, we report the first use of SBRT for the treatment of refractory VT secondary to cardiac lipoma. The short‐term outcome in this case suggests that SBRT is a safe and effective treatment option for this type of arrhythmia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the MRIdian system is a 0.35 T onboard MR scanner, we had to clear and consent our patient to off-label scanning at 0.35 T. Scanning implanted devices at low-field versus high-field strength is expedient because of the reduced specific absorption rate, 17 reduced null band artifacts, 18 reduced magnetic susceptibility, 19 and overall reduced ferromagnetic pull on the magnetic implant. Additionally, there are fewer spatial distortion effects due to less perturbation of magnetic susceptibility from the introduced implant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved SNR and contrast‐to‐noise ratio may be achievable at 0.35 T using a balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) version of CAPTURE 52,54 . However, the T 1 ‐weighted CAPTURE is much less sensitive than the current ViewRay bSSFP sequences to banding artifacts from implanted metal typically found in the patient population 55 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52,54 However, the T 1weighted CAPTURE is much less sensitive than the current ViewRay bSSFP sequences to banding artifacts from implanted metal typically found in the patient population. 55…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%