Lessons learned from participatory research to enhance client participation in long-term care research: a multiple case study

Abstract

Background Although participatory research is known to have advantages, it is unclear how participatory research can best be performed. This study aims to report on lessons learned in collaboration with service users involved as co-researchers in three participatory teams in long-term care. Methods A multiple case study design was chosen to explore the collaboration in three teams, each covering one specific client group receiving long-term care: physically or mentally frail elderly people, people with mental health problems or people with intellectual disabilities. Results A good working environment and a good collaboration were found to be crucial requirements for participatory research. A good working environment was developed by discussing reasons for engagement and wishes, formulating basic rules, organizing training sessions, offering financial appreciation, and the availability of the researcher to give travel support. The actual collaboration was established by developing a bond and equal positioning, deciding on the role division, holding on to transparency and a clear structure, and have sufficient time for the collaboration. Moreover, the motivations and unique contributions of the co-researchers and differences between the teams were reported. The motivations of co-researchers ranged from individual goals – such as personal development, creating a new social identity and belonging to a social group – to more external goals, such as being valuable for other service users and increasing the quality of care. An inclusive collaboration required valuing the individual contributions of co-researchers and adjustment to team differences. Conclusions The results showed the importance of developing a good working environment and establishing a good collaboration for participatory research. Furthermore, the study shows that individual and team differences should be taken into account. These results can be used by researchers for designing and shaping future research projects in long-term care in collaboration with co-researchers.

How to foster successful implementation of a patient reported experience measurement in the disability sector: an example of developing strategies in co-creation

“…While representing a broad variety of expertise (supporting people who are communication-vulnerable, designing and implementing complex interventions, and behaviour change) they were responsible for design and content decisions based on the care-users, professionals and management input. Lofman (2004) and Scheffelaar (2020) emphasised the possible unequal relationships between the researchers and care-users and the importance of relationship-building to overcome this issue [ 34 , 35 ]. Our study showed that, especially for the care-users, cherishing relationships and creating a safe environment enabled this group to feel supported to participate.…”

Towards an open and effective dialogue on complementary medicine in oncology: protocol of patient participatory study ‘COMMON’

“…To ensure the privacy of study participants, the coresearchers sign a confidentiality agreement. Two important conditions for participatory research were yielded by a previous multiple case study 36 : a good working environment and good collaboration. These conditions can be achieved by the organisation of training sessions, availability of the researcher, (financial) appreciation and a clear division of roles.…”

Qualitative instruments involving clients as co-researchers to assess and improve the quality of care relationships in long-term care: an evaluation of instruments to enhance client participation in quality research

“…For the analysis of the results, co-researchers were expected to share their experiences, give advice and participate in the discussions of the work meetings. Results were summarised by the team and communicated to the respondents to provide them with general information on the study findings 39…”