2021
DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2021.v47.i4.3880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons learned from operating a pre-commercialisation field-testing platform for innovative non-sewered sanitation in Durban, South Africa

Abstract: The Engineering Field Testing Platform (EFTP) was designed to provide an opportunity for technology developers (TDs) to test non-sewered sanitation prototypes in the eThekwini Municipal Area (Durban), South Africa. Between 2017 and 2020, 15 sanitation systems were tested in informal settlements, peri-urban households, and other ‘real world’ settings. This paper illustrates the lessons learned from establishing and managing this testing platform. Costs and timelines for testing are dependent on several factors,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, decentralized systems for off-grid applications are vexed with technical difficulties due to the nature of specific site locations, limitation of electrical power, and system complexity [48]. Developing a passive method to control the cathode potential and enrich for cathode-oxidizing bacteria make denitrifying biocathodes a viable treatment option in situations where water demand does not need to be met, such as for remediation purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, decentralized systems for off-grid applications are vexed with technical difficulties due to the nature of specific site locations, limitation of electrical power, and system complexity [48]. Developing a passive method to control the cathode potential and enrich for cathode-oxidizing bacteria make denitrifying biocathodes a viable treatment option in situations where water demand does not need to be met, such as for remediation purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%