2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons learned from environmental risk assessment within the framework of Seveso Directive in Czech Republic and Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preventive activity in the service station contributes to the protection of human lives, property and the environment, and increases preparedness for dealing with emergencies. Preventive activity is a set of organizational, management, personal, educational, technical, technological and material measures [22].…”
Section: Case Study Of the Using Cost-benefit Analysis In Organizatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventive activity in the service station contributes to the protection of human lives, property and the environment, and increases preparedness for dealing with emergencies. Preventive activity is a set of organizational, management, personal, educational, technical, technological and material measures [22].…”
Section: Case Study Of the Using Cost-benefit Analysis In Organizatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Seveso III Directive hopes to enhance the capacity of environmental protection of the entire region in a lasting and efficient way [34,35]. It is relatively complete and has been widely accepted in the European Union [10,28,36,37]. The fundamental assumption of the Seveso III Directive to assess the environmental risk is that industrial enterprises have the potential hazard of leaking pollutants.…”
Section: Potential Hazard Assessment Of Risk Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the framework of the transposition of the directive SEVESO III to the legal environment of the EU states a space for creating a unified approach for the risk assessment opened and it enabled, especially the state administration, to compare the results of individual companies with each other and on the other hand it would simplify the operation during checking the official documentation. [5] However, no principal steps were made in this area and the unified methodology has not been implemented yet. [6] Neither the EU directive nor the law about prevention of the major industrial accidents mention any software necessary for e.g.…”
Section: Fig2mentioning
confidence: 99%