1st Transdisciplinary Conference on Distributed Diagnosis and Home Healthcare, 2006. D2H2.
DOI: 10.1109/ddhh.2006.1624807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons Learned from Applying Interoperability and Information Exchange Standards to a Wearable Point-Of-Care System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, developing implementation methodologies able to limit the processing load to a minimum is of utmost importance. The ISO/IEEE11073 (X73) family of standards for PHDs (X73PHD) is aimed at providing seamless integration of PHDs into personal health solutions [4]. However, while it facilitates the exchange of medical measurements in a transparent way, the complexity of the protocol requires higher performance hardware in comparison to non-standardized ad-hoc protocols [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, developing implementation methodologies able to limit the processing load to a minimum is of utmost importance. The ISO/IEEE11073 (X73) family of standards for PHDs (X73PHD) is aimed at providing seamless integration of PHDs into personal health solutions [4]. However, while it facilitates the exchange of medical measurements in a transparent way, the complexity of the protocol requires higher performance hardware in comparison to non-standardized ad-hoc protocols [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, standardization seems to be the most efficient way to achieve an interoperable ecosystem, as has been remarked in much of relevant bibliography. [7][8][9][10] International organizations have been working for several years on the promotion of standardization to fill this interoperability gap. Originally, the European Committee for Standardization (CEN, with its specific Technical Committee for Health Informatics CEN/TC251, in which our research group collaborates 11 ) promoted the definitions of several norms for medical information interoperability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%