Lessons Learned From a Living Lab on the Broad Adoption of eHealth in Primary Health Care

Abstract

Background: Electronic health (eHealth) solutions are considered to relieve current and future pressure on the sustainability of primary health care systems. However, evidence of the effectiveness of eHealth in daily practice is missing. Furthermore, eHealth solutions are often not implemented structurally after a pilot phase, even if successful during this phase. Although many studies on barriers and facilitators were published in recent years, eHealth implementation still progresses only slowly. To further unravel the slow implementation process in primary health care and accelerate the implementation of eHealth, a 3-year Living Lab project was set up. In the Living Lab, called eLabEL, patients, health care professionals, small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and research institutes collaborated to select and integrate fully mature eHealth technologies for implementation in primary health care. Seven primary health care centers, 10 SMEs, and 4 research institutes participated. Objective: This viewpoint paper aims to show the process of adoption of eHealth in primary care from the perspective of different stakeholders in a qualitative way. We provide a real-world view on how such a process occurs, including successes and failures related to the different perspectives. Methods: Reflective and process-based notes from all meetings of the project partners, interview data, and data of focus groups were analyzed systematically using four theoretical models to study the adoption of eHealth in primary care. Results: The results showed that large-scale implementation of eHealth depends on the efforts of and interaction and collaboration among 4 groups of stakeholders: patients, health care professionals, SMEs, and those responsible for health care policy (health care insurers and policy makers). These stakeholders are all acting within their own contexts and with their own values and expectations. We experienced that patients reported expected benefits regarding the use of eHealth for self-management purposes, and health care professionals stressed the potential benefits of eHealth and were interested in using eHealth to distinguish themselves

Avoiding harm: Tackling problematic polypharmacy through strengthening expert generalist practice

“…Their broader vision of research quality may offer a framework by which to judge the generation of knowledge from a blurred model of research that reverses the current direction of flow of knowledge translation 46 . Instead of focusing on the implementation of biomedical research in practice (evidence‐based practice), we may also use, for example, Living Lab models 47 to capture the daily scholarship of clinicians 18 and patients 6 alike in order to generate the practice‐based evidence 46 needed to develop tailored healthcare.…”

Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT

“…Before being applied in standard care, healthcare IT and digital devices in healthcare have to provide evidence on safety and/or the effectiveness regarding clinical or health-related outcomes. However, due to the still overarching dominance of IT experts and institutions in the development processes of such devices, both the participation of end-users (patients and providers alike) as well as evidence-based data collection using adequate methods is still lacking [ 8 24 ]. To this date, there is a number of prototypical processes for the user-centred design of specific health care IT applications, such as teleconsultation systems [ 25 ], web-based health information databases [ 26 ] and consumer mobile health applications [ 27 ].…”